Obama's Shame Sham

President Obama is now shaming the nation for 'forgetting the Newtown tragedy' in light of the country's backlash against his unconstitutional attack on lawfully owned and obtained firearms. His most recent ploy is not so unfamiliar. He and his handlers almost always dress the camera's field of view with a perception of union or agreement with cherry-picked supporters of his many unpopular policies in order to boost their bogus legitimacy. Sometimes he does this with a background of soldiers, cops, firemen, women, or more unforgivably, with a backdrop of children. Obama is once again using 'human shields' as a landscape to support his radical hatred toward the Second Amendment, and has this time, surrounded himself with grieving mothers who have lost children to senseless gun violence. This tactic, the use of human props that are in lock-step with his anti-gun agenda through personal misery, have become a staple of the Obama administration when appealing to public scrutiny. The mostly left-leaning media is more than happy to appease their political Messiah by not only nodding in agreement through biased segments and bold supportive headlines, they have also been willing to outright misreport or choose not to report pertinent facts.

I can't believe that I am still reading that the Newtown murderer used a semi-automatic rifle (commonly referred to as an AR-15), when indeed he likely didn't. This was purposely withheld or initially suppressed from the public by the media in order to aid the president and other far-left haters of the Second Amendment to ban assault rifles. 'Official' and 'authoritative' sources have waffled with so much 'back and forth' on the issue of what was used and what wasn't, that it is now evident that politics are more important than the facts. It is more likely that the truth in Newtown, was that only pistols were used in the school killing by a mentally unstable, lone-nut who ended his deadly siege with his own 'suicide'. This was reported later by NBC when contrary details were ferreted out by other news networks. Since this admission, many different accounts have emerged concerning what was implemented in the massacre. The AR-15 style rifle was said to have been left in the madman's car, along with a supposed shotgun. However, the consensus over those items used are still in dispute. Go figure. Lanza, the deranged killer, likely thought that he would be detected more easily if he were wielding a long gun in plain sight as he entered the school, while he could conceal the much smaller handguns under his clothing. The media blackout or facts withheld by investigating agencies during the period of time that (mostly) democrats have been cooking-up their diabolical plan to employ their anti-gun agenda, was indeed intentional and therefore can't be trusted. Obama and his ilk, wish to muddy the waters as much as possible to cloud their true intentions. At this point, anti-gunners might ask, “What difference does it make, look at the loss of life?” And I say, “Why lie about it from the beginning and purposely mislead the public?” We all know why they lied from the beginning, and continue lying about the gun culture in the United States as it pertains to lawful gun owners and the true purpose of the Second Amendment. As a side note, the activity of another curious man apprehended at the scene in Newtown has not been fully explained, as well as some other activity in a wooded area behind or around the school. Similar oddities and misreporting surrounding Columbine and even the bombing in Oklahoma of a federal building (Timothy McVeigh), place a cloak of doubt on media portrayal of these socially and politically driven 'massacres'. Facts are conveniently gleaned, trimmed, washed, or added to as 'officials' and 'authorities' all try to get their stories straight for New World (UN) agendas. Meanwhile, evidence that doesn't jibe with the final-official-authoritative, got-it-right-this-time-finally account, are unsatisfactorily explained away while witnesses that challenge those official claims wane into obscurity.

Those in opposition to Obama's real agenda, which is a gun grab from law abiding gun owners, wonder if there might be mothers, fathers, soldiers, law men and others who have a different story to tell. For every Columbine or Newtown that is randomly committed by mentally disturbed individuals hell-bent on killing innocence, there are innumerable unreported incidents of thwarted murders, along with rape, abduction, robbery, and/or assault that might also have resulted in innocent death. The key agent in the deterrence of all these possible daily 'Newtowns' that are rarely published, were that the would-be victims had firearms. Obama, who lives in the ultimate bubble of firearms defense, of which even James Bond would be envious, is protected by a literal army of Secret Service agents, roof top snipers, police, and hi-tech gadgetry unlike anyone else on the face of the earth. Yet, he and his minions want to limit an American's choice of defense, magazine capacities and semi-automatic firepower. Obama doesn't hesitate in giving advanced fighter jets, fully automatic weapons, munitions, and lending U.S. special operators to train and support unstable Middle Eastern regimes that are unfriendly to our Israeli allies. However, the president has not lost a single night's sleep over Eric Holder's debacle of Operation Fast and Furious, which gave arms to drug cartels that resulted in at least one death of a federal agent. Yet, Obama and his administration also balked at sending aid to our own embassy in Benghazi that resulted in a number of American deaths at the hands of Muslim extremists. Such traitorous acts defy logic. Is it no wonder that this same president and his supporters want to disarm Americans using yet another school tragedy initiated by a madman? Obama is okay with routine, non-sensationalized, mundane murder that wastes the lives of many innocent citizens every single day, but he isn't above jumping on a perceived crisis like Newtown if it benefits his anti-gun agenda. I hope Obama and his supporters fall flat on their faces in their attempt to limit the Second Amendment. However, it won't be the media reporting the mass of pro gun advocates hopefully standing in the way. Instead, we'll hear Obama's carefully smithed talking points, which may sound reasonable to the layperson who doesn't understand the value of having armed citizens in a world of pressing tyranny, corrupt political figures, unstoppable crime, and the occasional crazed bastard with a gun who will shoot-up an unprotected school. By the way, how long will we be in denial about protecting our children as we protect the president and other fat cat politicians? They certainly know the truth about the world they live in, yet they expect common citizens to be unprotected. We live in a world full of evil, and government intrusion upon individual freedoms. The president and his band of highly protected, elite, political hypocrites reject that citizens should be armed. While their unpopular ideologies and impositions make them targets of foreign governments and outraged citizens, 'We the People' could be slaughtered simply for our billfolds or even a trendy pair of tennis shoes. Make no mistake. Those who would beat their swords into plowshares, will plow for those who don't. Obama will bask in Newtown for political gain, social (Marxist) change, and more government encroachment. Hopefully, all American's will come to recognize Obama for what he has always been; a wolf in sheep's clothing.

The Death of the Opposing Parties (archive article)

The New World Order’s most obvious pair-up of dueling presidential candidates making a ‘Run for the Roses’ was Bill Clinton vs. George H.W. Bush. There was a glitch in the race, however, that changed politics forever. It was a little horse that wandered on to the track named Ross Perot. Few commoners have the personal wealth to challenge the groomed and privileged. In the win, place, or show column he was a distant third on a track reserved for thoroughbreds and controllable stakes. Just seeing him out there challenging the status quo was inspiring to those buying the $2 dollar tickets. The folks liked him. He was on the ‘Straight Talk Express’ long before McCain, and though his ears were proportionately larger than Obama’s, he wasn’t nearly as handsome or well spoken. He was a third party candidate in a crap shoot usually reserved for predictable two party outcomes. Not since Teddy Roosevelt had anyone had the gall or the green backs to challenge the ‘Chosen Two’. Perot’s luck would not match the Bull Moose Party’s unique popularity in history, but it raised enough influential eyebrows that it exposed the hand of what the two-party system had become.

No longer would a third party be able to join in on the presidential debates. No longer would a third party distract or challenge the larger issue, New World commonalities of the Republican and Democratic parties or the goofy special interests that had both defined and separated them. Out came the usual props that had been poked into the political closets from past elections. Out came the God, guns, and gay issues, our oil-based economy, abortion, and the environment; all the things the odds keepers use to usher you to either the bride or groom’s side of the aisle. These are all things that don’t matter to the New World Order, but are useful tools to forecast which way the nation will swing any given year. It has become abundantly clear that there is no real difference in the 'World' agenda, just careful wavering speech, sugar-coated with talk that means little, but comforts our special needs or calms certain fears. Anytime Ted Kennedy and George Bush could agree on anything, I am automatically suspicious.

 We have an invasion occurring by the millions at our southern border, and our leadership in our two-party system is not only ignoring it, they are aiding in its success. They want amnesty, legal slaves, a labor class, mediocrity, a grateful voting base for the future that is ignorant of or willing for an Order of the ‘haves’ and the ‘have nots’. However, this time the ‘have nots’ will have a little more than the hopeless poverty they left in Mexico, while the middle class backbone of America gets to delve a little deeper into a poverty not yet experienced. The grateful immigrant and the not so grateful American citizen are now growing side-by-side with an uneasy tension brewing between them. It is a new animosity keeping the little people fighting among themselves, and begging for help from (you guessed it) the Feds. It’s an old story book tale, that only revolution has the ability to close.

It is a Constitutional issue being ignored because of free-trade agreements (money for the few, less freedom for the masses) made behind the backs of the American people by elitists of the major political parties, industry and world banks. The Constitution is now dead because when we were sold out by our elitist politicians, the Federal Reserve, the Tri-lateral Commission and a host of other horrors for the purpose of ‘world unity’ (at least economically), the Constitution stood in the way. Those who were entrusted to protect ‘the laws of the land’ broke ‘the laws of the land’ with a number of treasonous policies, treaties, and agreements. Now there is no law, just a bank note attached to the American people that says, “Pay on demand.” It is said that there is always a warning or a sign before something really bad happens. Ross Perot had an itch that something was wrong. He’d made his way honestly throughout his life. He was a success story, and he stuck his wet thumb in the air and felt something bad enough that he decided to set off the alarm. Now the ‘sucking sound’ he was famous for exposing, has come to pass. He convinced 17 to 20 percent of the voters to take a chance on him. Those kinds of odds can swing an election or give a glimmer of hope to a public tired of the same old song. After the election was past, the heads-that-be decided not to let third parties be involved in debates anymore. Perot’s party went the way of the Tyrannosaurus Rex, and the New World agenda continues on. Henry Kissinger was right. We are going to have a New World Order whether we want one or not. God help us.

Agenda 101

The enemy of my enemy is my friend,

so together we'll fight until we win.

Conspiring tactics in great detail,

to find their weakness and impale

a savage blow, leaving just us two.

Will you then trust me, and shall I trust you?

So, cautious now we may appear,

till allies gained become quite clear.

We'll toss the gauntlet once again,

as the enemy of my enemy

becomes my friend.

And now that we've defeated them,
a fence I'll build here from within,
to seperate my rule from those,
who may one day myself oppose.
And so it is, as I did begin,
seeking enemies to be my friend.

- M.R. Behr 

“Those Who Would Hammer Their Guns Into Plowshares, Will Plow For Those Who Do Not.”

The words I used in my title have been said to be those of Thomas Jefferson, though it has never been proven from any of his letters or works. But I contend that these words don't mean any less had Jefferson not uttered them, as long as they indeed ring true. They certainly ring true with this article. The murder of a 15 year old Chicago girl was a mere blip on a radar screen in comparison to the attention the Obama administration attributed to the Newtown, Connecticut slayings at Shady Hook Elementary School. This is greatly in part to the Progressive Movement's philosophy of making the very best of a perceived crisis. So why, you might ask, did another possible gang-generated slaying even make the national news? After all, in Chicago, the adopted home of Barack Obama, 42 murders have already occurred since the new year. I'm writing this in early February. There were approximately 500 murders in the Windy City the year before. Well, not to say that the other 541 people (surely more have died since I penned this) weren't important, but this particular young lady had participated in Obama's recent presidential inauguration. That act, gave her notoriety and rose her above the common, now routine amount of slayings in a state where the gun laws are probably some of the toughest in the country. Though I might say that those laws are toughest on law-abiding citizens, they are of course barely applicable to crooks, thugs, drug dealers and gangs of which Rahm Emanuel and many mayors preceding him have been powerless to curtail.


Her name was Hadiya Pendleton, a beautiful talented young lady whose light was taken from her due to senseless violence. The left-wing media quickly attached this model youth to the Obama witch hunt on gun ownership, but I'm not so sure it was a welcome association. This mostly one-sided media thought they were contributing yet another notch to the President's own pistol grip used to attack gun rights, however, they forgot to consult the Alinsky play book to truly see if the Pendleton murder qualified as a good case. It was kind of like when the media and Al Sharpton rushed into the Trayvon Martin shooting, hoping for a white on black crime to exploit for the race-baiting Obama Administration. Much to their chagrin, it wasn't such an open and shut case. Zimmerman (a typical Aryan sounding name of Germanic origin if you're simply mining headlines) ended up being of mixed ethnic descent. The incident didn't pan out as they had hoped it would. I would venture to guess that the media and Reverend Al probably do a bit more research when selecting a controversial issue to confront since that pitiful debacle. The Prez jumped right in there too, with his comment that Trayvon could have been his own son. Really? Obama also chimed-in on a 'white cop vs. a black college professor' conflict, inciting that the cop was in some way racist, or perhaps at the least, profiling. Again, it didn't pan out do to the cop's sensitivity training and professionalism. This ended up in a rather bizarre 'Beer Summit' to ice over the obvious faux pas. The Obama Administration has become more cautious in how it picks it's battles, and you can bet the Hadiya Pendleton murder was a bit of a political hot potato in the White House strategy room. Here's why.

You can safely wager that the Obama Administration 'skunk-works' were scrambling on how, if possible, to spin the Hadiya Pendleton shooting. The problem was how to avoid or skip around the blatant hypocrisy. How do you go about an aggressive gun-grab, when it is now so clearly obvious through Hadiya's example that only law-abiding citizens can be harmed by disarming or downgrading their own defense, while the criminal element remains well armed and at large. Surely, some of those folks in the 541 other people murdered in Chicago in the past 13 months, were either unarmed or out-gunned citizens thanks to Illinois tough gun laws. Surely some of these citizens were killed in their own homes and not in a city park. It is also irresistible to point out once again that Obama's own Justice Department was involved in its own gun running scandal that cost the life of a U.S. border agent. Or, that this gun-grabbing administration will be selling a total of 20, F-16 fighter jets to the unstable government of Egypt which they aided in revolution, only to replace the vacuum with the Muslim Brotherhood. Feeling the coming betrayal by Obama, Israel is now taking matters in its own hands with the instability in Syria. The NRA, an organization that has heralded gun safety and the 2nd Amendment for over 100 years, attended in good faith, Vice President Biden's committee meeting on guns with the intent of helping get to the bottom of the gun violence issue, but Biden and his band of gun hating zealots ignored this age old group. The NRA wanted to talk about mental illness and crime, but it didn't suit the true Progressive agenda which is simply, to disarm the American people. So you see, Obama's 'think tank' might well try to let a sleeping dog lie in Chicago. They were successful in getting the media and police departments to withhold the truth about Newtown from the public. They wanted the focus to be on AR-15 military style rifles and armaments, so it was intentionally withheld from the American people that this rifle, though in the car of the murderous madman, never made it into the school. He accomplished his murderous rampage with several pistols. For a deranged man, hell bent on dealing death to innocents, he might well have used anything pointed, explosive, flammable, toxic, blunt or sharp. Why? Because any thinking human knows that it is the madman behind all these implements that can improvise murder. It happens in prisons every single day, where security is as high as it can possibly be. It doesn't stop killing, drug running, raping, plotting, or prison personnel who are on-the-take. Knowing that, why then do we not disarm criminals and the mentally unstable, instead of law-abiding Americans? If you do hammer your weapons into plowshares, then you will plow for those who don't.

The government knows the truth about mankind, which is why it is armed to the teeth. The President, Senators and other high officials know the truth about mankind, and arm their guards and Secret Service personnel at an enormous cost to American tax payers. The rich, radical left-wing elitists like Mayor 'Big Gulp' Bloomberg of New York, and Rahm 'Deadfish' Emanuel of Chi-town, know the truth about mankind and are surrounded by armed security with high capacity magazines and automatic weapons (we lowly citizens have to use semi-autos). Are those elites more precious than Hadiya Pendleton and what remains of her family? Are these heavily guarded public servants any better or more worthy of security than you? Anyone of them could be compromised due their elitist, Marxist ideologies, but you; you could be killed just because some nut wanted the Nike shoes you were wearing on your feet. It isn't their 'royal hind-asses' that are on the line in the real world. Progressives aren't the ones in denial about the world condition. They're armed and safe. There is a reason these particular elites love class warfare, race-baiting, redistribution, and entitlements. Because that is exactly how they plan to control us. They'll have their ruling class (of which most of them are already multi-millionaires), and then there will be the rest of us. It will then truly be an 'Us and Them' scenario. We'll be so busy scrambling for their handouts, we will have forgotten that we were once their bosses and that they answered to us and hopefully feared our public outrage. These entrusted politicians have been traitors to our Constitution and our sovereignty. Yet, it has been our own lethargy that allowed such a cancer to metastasize.

Supposedly, Obama has talked to the Pendleton family and given his condolences. I'm sure he's had contact with 'Rahm-bo', and others of equal impotency like Jesse Jackson (who at one time wanted Obama's testicles in cup) that will try to keep damage control at a minimum, or have a carefully scripted speech drafted that will be pontificated as friends and family of Hadiya grieve their tragic loss. The Obama Administration will doubtfully parade this family around like they have Gabby Gifford, due to the true face of this particular type of gun violence which cries out for arming law-abiding civilians. Mayor Rahm Emanuel announced a reward for anyone who would 'snitch' on the gunman that killed Hadiya Pendleton. Reminiscent of Orwell, Rahm stated, “You won't be a snitch if you come forward. Be a citizen”. Where was such a plea for the other 541 that were murdered on his watch. No one was watching or holding the mayor accountable. Emanuel could care less. He's living large. Only when it advances their sick Progressive agenda, does any incident get attention. Otherwise, it's a local routine matter. Fighting crime and drug dealing would endanger those political cowards who don't have the guts to focus on cleaning their own cesspool, if indeed they aren't involved in the illegalities themselves. Chicago Marxist politics have never been above that. There will be no revival of 'the Untouchables'. Out of sight out of mind. I've seen where the reward for Hadiya's killer is up to $40,000 now, and that police believe that the many tips coming in might bring the shooter to quick justice. Its strange what lengths political officials will go to when the cameras are rolling and American's are watching their actions. But that will pass soon enough. The sorry truth is that all they are capable of doing are flowery speeches, creating stuffed animal memorials, and lighting candles, but challenging true crime or seriously confronting mental illness aren't on the agenda. It never was on the agenda. It was a 'bastard child' discussed behind closed doors and out of the spotlight. The thing that our New World government fears the most, are the law-abiding citizens that could organize and uprise against tyranny. Supposed republican and certainly Progressive democrats have worked feverishly to write laws that could make anyone a suspected terrorist (ie, the Patriot Act and other bills coming down the pipeline). New, wacky gun laws will make law-abiding believers of the Second Amendment into instant criminals, and their homes and possessions are likely to be inspected at a whim from a number of government agencies if citizens practice their First Amendment right and harshly criticize tyranny.

These elements are intentionally laced into the law, so that anyone can be subject to governmental scrutiny. Ask rocker Ted Nugent about his brush with federal law. He's not barking quite as loud since they nearly nabbed him on some obscure hunting law. They even told his hunting pal that if he 'turned on Nugent' they'd be easy on him. The judge in the infraction wasn't even aware of the law, but ignorance (as they say) is no alibi for not knowing the law. They want Nugent to shut his mouth, and he's now piped down quite a bit in this debate. Who'd blame him? It beats wasting away in some federal penitentiary. Outspoken critic of Obama, war hero Chris Kyle, was gunned down at a firing range by a combat vet suffering from PTSD (and perhaps a bit of MK-ULTRA). Coincidence? I don't think so. Timely though, wasn't it? Seems the squeaky wheels are getting 'greased'. And how about the 'survivalist' that gunned down that bus driver and took a kid hostage? A perfect example of why even a bus driver on a school bus should carry a gun, in my opinion. I had even predicted school bus hijacks would one day occur. It doesn't take a genius to see that one coming. The poor driver tried to defend those kids with absolutely nothing but his heroism, which was consequently not impervious to lead. Lesson learned you'd think, but the networks didn't even consider that the bus driver could have ended the madness with a gun of his own. If the loony 'prepper' was that crazy he could have shot a hell of lot of kids. He certainly had the opportunity, but that wasn't really what he was after or he'd have done it. The news reports he was a cranky, mean SOB anyway, but some 'normal' folk will soon be starting to 'act out' to the unrelenting squeeze the feds are putting on our personal liberties. It was not a wise way to go about protesting it, but look for more of this 'paranoid' behavior in the future as 'the Gov' reticulates its serpentine coils around our freedoms more and more. Every American will have their breaking point, and this administration more than any before it, is certainly testing those limits. They are causing the paranoia, all the feelings of desperation, and the outlandish reactions of those approaching their personal boiling points.

Its said that Obama is now going after the banks that do business with gun manufacturers. How underhanded is that, and who gives him the authority? Is he now the Dictator-in-Chief? So, I hearken to the Pendleton's, the parent's of the children murdered in Newtown, government voodoo-doll Gabrielle Gifford, and any others that this or any administration might use as a prop for the national disarming of citizens; don't cut your own throats. Don't allow the day to come when you'll have to look at a son, daughter, wife, husband, family member or friend and say, “I'm sorry I couldn't protect you against the minds of madmen, be they criminals, gang members, the mentally ill, or a tyrannical administration. Don't be forced to 'plow' for any entity or government, simply because you trusted their 'good intentions'. Use the brain the good Lord put inside your skull. Don't be a hopeless, pleading dishrag.

'Ole Happy Day' Is Well On It's Way

I had a rather sinister genius for a Geometry teacher in the 1970's. He seemed ancient, certainly old fashioned as he might at any time become offended by 'hot pants' and the mini-skirts that finally hit my rural town a decade after they became popular. He would actually make everyone turn their desks around so he wouldn't see bare legs. He loved test days and would often exclaim in his annoying goblin-like voice,


“Guess what today is? That's right, it's Ole Happy Day! It's the day you reap what you've sown. Close your books and don't let your eyes wander 'cause I'll be a watchin'. Now it's time to pay the piper, for all the studyin' you didn't do. Come and get your F,” he shouted, as one-by-one each student approached his desk to pick up their dreaded test sheet.

To us, Ole Happy Day meant one thing, and that was 'the end'. It was Judgment Day. I'd hoped I'd never be as cynical as that old tyrannical coot, but as I've watched this lovely experiment called the United States of America become desecrated by elite liberal termites, my anger prays for 'Ole Happy Day'. My heart begs for that last weighty straw that will finally scuttle this beautiful ship and give me the satisfaction that every worthless larvae that bought into the idea of the Progressive movement will be gobbled up by an unforgiving sea and become the excrement of crabs and shrimp. I don't blame the many poor, the uneducated, or those outside my own race, gender, or sexual orientation who hungered for justice, equality, and dignity that any human being deserves; for among all of these, had come great men and women of talent, courage, and brilliance. I resent, however, that many of them could not always recognize how they were pawned, coaxed, and gamed into becoming a manipulative demographic, acting as a darting school of fish bolting as one non-inquisitive shimmer to the cue of their white, elitist, and liberal puppet masters. These unfortunate souls have been used and martyred for centuries, flanking the cause of a movement based more on positioning larger events for the 'Big Picture', than empowering those who have been exploited for the goals of the New World Order. This doesn't excuse both educated, middle class liberals and conservatives from their greatest sin, which has much more to do with arrogance. We typically (me being conservative in my own political notions) refuse to see what is obviously playing out before our very eyes. We tend to be in denial over admitting there is a larger conspiracy, because to consider the 'C-word' is taboo among serious commentary and analysts. We've been told all our lives that if something is too good to be true, you're probably right. It's probably a scam. In one of my favorite books about mob boss, Sam 'Mooney' Giancana (who worked hand-in-hand with the CIA for decades) there's a few old sayings that should be heralded, and I'll paraphrase them:

“In politics and among administrations there is no such thing as a coincidence.” Also, “When a whole lot of people end up dead, look around to see among them who is left standing for the answers you may be seeking. Who benefits? That's your fella, group or organization you're looking for.”

Since I opened my eyes to entertain conspiracies, everything but the 'Big Picture' becomes easier to see. In fact, it would be humorous if it weren't so pathetically tragic. You might recall the dreaded McCarthy Era. Remember when there were communists everywhere? Marxists and Socialists were pouring into our universities and crawling all over Hollywood. Even today, McCarthy is compared to the Inquisition or a Puritanical witch hunter. Turns out, if you read outside of the venues infiltrated by the Reds, McCarthy was actually spot-on. We need look no further (though we should) than our hallowed halls of higher learning and the credits rolling on the Silver Screen to know that the left-wing media ridicule that was thrown at McCarthy, provided pretty good interference for commie hatch lings. Since that time, they have fully matured and politically hide themselves under the title of the Progressive movement. Borrowing a guise of liberalism, they run for office on the Democratic platform.

Socialistic unions headed by Marxist ranchers that own their members (marked by their Democrat brands), stampede as a common herd to all Progressive causes regardless of their ridiculousness. These cattle are easily collied, prodded, and driven, as would be expected of grazing bovine whose brains are never too far from the dirt. African Americans, who until Barry Goldwater, sided with Lincoln's Republican party, overwhelmingly have swallowed the Progressive Trojan Horse pill that their white, elitist-run, closet Communist plantation owners lured them into ingesting in the early days of the Civil Rights movement. And now, religiously conservative, Catholic-valued Hispanic's have abandon their moral teaching to thwart the 'insensitive' Caucasians (propaganda used by Progressives ) who are attacking their illegal brethren because they are brown (more propaganda), and not for the more obvious reason that they have entered the country illegally, which is now en vogue only in the United States. You can thank our liberal media and Progressive talking heads for nurturing that hatred. But that is what Progressive honey-badgers do. They don't give a crap. They'll say anything. Whatever sticks works.

Mexico arrests all illegals as does Canada. Many other countries detain and/or execute illegal border crossers as spies. We give illegals a bottle of water (as we should), deport them to their country (as we should), and drain our resources as our own government sues our border states for upholding the law that federal law enforcement either neglects or can't handle. It all makes perfect sense, if and only if, there is entirely something else going on here. So, forget the bogus line of being humanitarians and a nation of immigrants. That is all political double-speak. Obama did little in those areas, even in his own adopted city of Chicago, where more South Side black children are either gunned down or aborted every week than those killed in a single maniacal act in Newtown, Connecticut. All this from a state (Illinois) where gun laws are the strictest in the nation. Where's the media outrage, or Obama's corrupt Justice Department? Well, it simply doesn't advance the Progressive agenda to quell ghetto gun violence in Chi-town, so who would want to draw attention to it? No, the Obama administration has a tight schedule to adhere to, and by the pace they are setting (screwing up the Middle East, meddling in state governments, crashing our economy, gun running & drug operations, gun grabbing, and race baiting), their elite, white, leftist handlers seem like they are really ready to sock-it to what is left of their hobbled conservative resistance.

Well, let not your heart be troubled. It is still important to be principled and righteous, but don't become down trodden over events that are destined to occur. You and I are not in control of the world narrative, and if we were to become a slight barrier to that destiny, we'd end up plowing into the side of the Pentagon like Barbara Olson, inhaling some heart attack inducing aerosol like Andrew Breitbart, or fatally flipping our vehicle on a lonely dirt road from dealing with a sudden case of 'Boston Brakes' as was likely the case of Cochise County Sheriff, Larry Dever. The fix has been in for a number of decades now, and there ain't gonna be any stopping it. Just looking at a cold-blooded lizard like Barrack Obama, hearing his repeated phony act, and becoming nauseated by the media's need for a 'pantie change' every time the president addresses the nation, is like forcing my nails across a chalk board. But, he's the current poster child of the New World Order. He's the flavor of the week, completing the shopping list that has been handed him by his bosses.

I still get a chuckle when I think of the first time I'd ever seen Obama. He was the opening act of the Democratic Convention for Senator Kerry. He gave his Audacity of Hope speech that mesmerized and introduced his presence to the nation. Who was this handsome charismatic junior Senator from Illinois, fresh off the Windy City's Communist puppy mill? Well, I knew instantly that the next time around he'd be getting tapped for the Oval Office. The camera panned the onlookers at the convention as he put on a brilliant performance, and as I noted before, Jessie Jackson and Hillary Clinton couldn't hide the disdain for this new Progressive sensation. It was all over their faces. I could read their thoughts and brother, they weren't very pretty. The Order had been grooming him a long time, and Hillary & Jessie knew at that moment, just as I knew, that their chance had passed them by. From then on they would be yesterday's news. That wasn't very respectful of the New World Order to cast them away so ungraciously now was it? They'd sold their souls to the cause and this was the thanks they got. Jackson was a pawn ever since he was used to hijack the Civil Rights movement. Like Obama, he was a cooperative newbie, but Jackson was probably recruited by an intelligence agency (most likely the CIA) to curtail the movement away from those closer to Dr. King. The Order would manipulate its reshaping and programing after they fatally blew-off King's mandible and tossed the bag of guilt on the lap of James Earl Ray. None of King's entourage cared much for Jackson. They probably could sense his ulterior motives. Jackson was inarticulate, awkward and perhaps too unsophisticated to handle the task, but I would guess he was 'worked' through money rather than ideological conviction. The media helped him along, holding his hand as they were instructed to do. And thus, the true movement died with MLK and his closest confidants. Like the Kennedy's (Jack and Bobby), King was perhaps more useful in death as a martyr of the Order's own construction. Though all three had many great faults, their positive public energies were experienced as genuine and perhaps even romantic. Camelot was a creation of the media. The Order made these men, used them, killed them, and then recreated them in martyrdom. They own them like a patent, even in death.

Hillary Clinton on the other hand, rode in on the coat tails of her playboy husband, enduring every embarrassing scandal under-reported by the Order influenced media (which was in the tank for Bill on most occasions). Following old mobster logic, one has to wonder why the Order seemingly abandon Clinton in his time of need (Whitewater, Lewinsky and his impeachment). My guess is that he tried to do something presidential, meaning he did something of his own accord that didn't sit well with the Order. He got his scare, shaped-up after his 'little room talk', and the Order took care of the damage control. Lesson learned. Allegiance to the Order is not a two-way street. Oh, and for liberals that think I'm too one sided, George W. Bush got his handed to him as well. Attitude adjustments are not exclusive to the democrat end of the New World spectrum. You might recall George Junior's suspicious whop to his eye. The story came out by the media that he tripped over something and fell. Looked like a shiner to me. George had become such a blathering, bungling idiot by the end of his last term that he couldn't speak coherently anymore. Perhaps he needed to be sedated or had just mentally folded under the tremendous pressure he was managing, but he completely lost his ability to speak and hold thoughts. It became such an embarrassment that the cooler heads of Cheney and Rumsfeld (longtime New World Order veterans of the conservative flavor) began speaking in behalf of the troubled president. In my opinion, Bush was haunted by the deaths and crippling of our many military men and woman he had to place in harms way. I've always felt that is why he does so much for our wounded warriors since being out of office. It was the Order's business being conducted, but Bush bore the weight of sending the troops. Obama reminds me of G.W. in a lot of ways, but coming from the left, Obama has had many more allies to cover and support his flagrant bouts of stupidity. The difference between the two is Obama's cold disdain toward our founding fathers and the sacred documents they penned, but please, we must go back to Hilly.

During Obama's first run for the presidency, and before Hillary got the memo that she was clearly not going to be supported by the Order, she rightly pointed out the junior Senator's naiveté and lack of experience. What she didn't know is that at this stage in the game the Oval Office needed a cooperative agent, not a proven leader. Though all conscious people recognize Obama as a counterfeit, the bulk of the nation either does not concern itself, or are inescapably enamored by the media's radiant portrayal of the NWO's latest puppet. Obama is following the recipe as the Order stirs the ingredients of radical change, but to what end? Do they really want Obama Marxism? Not likely. The Order doesn't really care about the poor, minorities, gay rights, women's rights, and so on and so forth. They don't particularly hate them either. The Order is indifferent toward all these things. Those causes and movements are props. They are 'furniture' to be moved around and create an appearance. They are tools used to fix or to disassemble situations. They are catalysts to help move or sway the masses. When you yell fire, folks tend to run; and when you tap the side of a glass folks tend to quiet themselves and await instructions. Things are happening very quickly now, whether or not Obama is aware of his role in the Order's grand illusion. Like most people in the driver's seat of power, their fatal flaw becomes the arrogant notion that they are in control due to their own greatness. The Order frocked Barack over Hillary because they'd been grooming him for years, and it was his time. The Clinton's had accumulated a lot of negative baggage (aka, scandals) that might be too much of a hindrance, where Obama's skeletons were utterly unknown and now seemingly well-blocked from the curious public's view. Being a liberal gives him an added 'free pass' from the greater part of the media. Being the first president of color created a great excuse to use the 'race card' to distract away from any public criticism of his policies. And, though I truly dislike Obama's dirty politics and narrow sighted philosophy, I find him to be a rather tragic figure. The Order is now so emboldened, that they seem to be telegraphing their 'prophesy' in plain sight through deniable symbolism. To me, he is playing the part of the spotted leopard that I see in the series of surreal, story-board murals (reminiscent of Dante's Inferno) on the wall at a certain location of the Denver International Airport. It is my opinion an artist was commissioned back in the 1990s to tell the story of how world events would unfold through its use of cloaked symbolism. It is bold and disturbing, yet there it is, right under our noses and short of 'conspiracy' writer's, it is seldom ever discussed or analyzed. Although not particularly eluding to the Denver Airport's murals, in her article entitled, The Divine Interpretation: A Study of Metaphor in Dante's Inferno, Melanie Barker described the symbolism of the spotted leopard:

“Dante uses the leopard to represent malicious or fraudulent sins because the leopard, having a spotted pelt, will disguise himself from a potential creature of prey. The leopard will bide his time and strike at the most optimal moment, when its prey least expects it.”

To me, this description bares an astounding resemblance to our Commander in Chief. Hiding behind his skin, blurring his intentions with smiles and good looks, manipulating every crisis for his own political gain, so as to reshape America into a country I will no longer recognize. I've long detected his insincerity and phoniness, from his ill use of children as his backdrop to changing his accent and vocal tempo depending on the crowd he is addressing. We call that kind of behavior, 'running with any dog that will hunt with you' in my neck of the woods. Yet not surprisingly, Barker went on in the same article to note that in Africa, these 'sins' are actually recognized as positive traits like speed, agility and cunning by some tribes who use the symbol of the leopard. This fits well with the New World Order's clever use of duality in owning both sides of any situation. It gives the Order the power of assured predictability of outcome as they guide the narrative along. Regardless of how we interpret the symbol as it is portrayed at the Denver Airport, negative or positive, we choose to see what we want to see. What matters to the Order is what they did with those symbolic images (as well as that spotted cat), and how these things influenced the endgame. They use the leopard (perhaps a US President) how they want, to get what they want, and when they want it. They are not respecters of men, or kings, or presidents. Everything is to benefit the 'Big Picture', of which anything and anyone may be placed in peril or chosen for sacrifice. Tyrant or redeemer, the leopard fares not well in Denver. However, it is the Order that will exploit its legacy for its best use; just as they did for JFK, MLK, RFK and many more before and after them around the world. They make kings, break kings, and control their portrayal after death. The common man can not judge these historic figures for their misgivings or true flaws in character, for they are sealed, hidden, or destroyed as not to disturb the artistic license used by the Order in arranging the legacies of their martyrs. The Order even goes so far as to garnish these martyr's tombs and likenesses with hints of their own dual symbolism that subtlety mark their victories and continued control. The greater mass of the people will always see or understand things in the way the Order intended. They will move and react following the proverbial 'crumb trail' that has been sprinkled down for them. How can one's mind wonder when they are constantly pailing water from their own boat? There are jobs to go to, children to support, things to buy, meals to make, and future's to plan. It all adds up to mass blindness and petty loyalties to political parties, unions, organizations, and causes that are easily influenced if not owned wholeheartedly by some faction betrothed to the Order.

What's going to happen is going to happen no matter what conspiracy theorists reveal. People tend to be in denial unless everything is packaged into a neat little container of understanding. Any hint of doubt will make the public drop the matter like a hot-potato, no matter how inexplicably odd some evidence might be. If it doesn't flow smoothly or 'make sense', the common citizen quickly falls into narcolepsy. The mainstream 'Order owned' media spins the story created for the masses, and the confused herd dials into their favorite network flavor to hear the news that best suits their taste buds. What it isn't seems so crystal clear, but what it really is or what is coming is still grainy and opaque. My gut says, “Na...wait a second here. This just ain't right. I'm sorry, I'm just not buyin' it.” But, even though you know something isn't right, you are unable to articulate why it's not right. To you, it's the elephant in the room, and as you look around you, you question, “How can you not see it?” That's the purpose of hearings like the Warren and 911 Commissions. Create huge volumes of confusing information and testimony, edit or dispose of anything quirky, odd, or true that doesn't fit the preplanned outcome, have a lengthy session over it, collate the outcome in a handsomely bound anthology, tie a bow around it, and add it to your library of books you never intend to read. It's done, end of story. The public now knows that it has been 'officially' figured-out and they can all go back to sleep. It's sad actually, but I've half-ass accepted the way things are. I understand the acceptable loss scenario. I can only hope that the Big Picture is what is best for this country and the world. Perhaps that is what the Order has always been about; lying and manipulating for the benefit of the planet, while making the tough decisions and sacrifices that can somehow justify mass deceit for assured outcome. It's lonely at times where I am right now, as I'm sure it is for others whose eyes and ears have been opened. I find myself longing for 'Ole Happy Day', so that I can feel justified in my convictions and rejuvenated with some kind of hope, that hitting the reset button will be a fresh new start in yet another 2,000 year cycle of the continuing struggle of mankind.