Capitalism: The Wealth Engine

As I have eluded to in the past, capitalism is a goose that lays golden eggs. It is quite simply an engine that generates wealth (or success in a variety of ways) by imitating nature. How well it works for the majority of the people who live under it, greatly depends upon the ability of elected lawmakers to quell corruption. Socialism, under the same condition, would still rather take the goose that lays the golden eggs, kill it, cook it, and distribute it into equal portions of meat, bone and broth for the demanding masses. Karl Marx, most likely, was pissed at capitalism and those who became greatly profitable from it, because he personally couldn't succeed. He felt held back. He wrongly placed his hatred upon the engine rather than the corruption and injustice that also profited from it. Marx also lost his faith in The Almighty, pledging to destroy capitalism and dethrone God. His personal misery birthed the nemesis of capitalism which became known as Marxism (socialism/Communism), and New World elites quickly seized the mechanism for their own manipulation. It was a useful means toward their end.

The engine or method of capitalism, possesses the key ingredients of success and failure that mimic nature. Nature is self reliant. If left alone, it thrives without bureaucracy. Within its resources, are cycles of wins and losses. It is a plethora of processes consisting of things that work and things that don't work, that are constantly improving its stock. It contains the elements of 'effort and risk', and in doing so, offers both challenges and benefits for all creatures dwelling within its domain. Most importantly, both nature and capitalism herald competition. This competition keeps nature strong and replenishing, and capitalism robust and advancing. In nature there are apex predators that have the fierceness and ability to obtain what they need by their cunning and skill, and naturally their offspring benefit and learn from their own experience. However, it is not without 'effort or risk'. A bear benefits from taking an elk, but may be gored or injured in the process by a sharp rack or a powerful bucking kick. What is left of this carcass benefits numerous other creatures, systems, and processes in nature. Capitalism operates very much the same way. There is 'effort and risk', cunning, skill, fierceness, ability, competition, benefit, winning and losing. However, the only creature competing within capitalism is human kind. I suppose that what capitalism lacks in creature diversity (nature's gambit of biology), it displays in levels of human desire and drive. Just as in nature, all human beings can and should benefit from those who obtain a level of wealth through their own 'effort and risk', achievement, skill, luck, and innovation. This is in stark contrast to those like Barrack Obama and Elizabeth Warren (Progressives/Marxists/Socialists) who claim to capitalism's success stories that, “You didn't do that (or make that) by yourself.” It's a rather whiny statement that is full of false and misleading assumptions.

There is a tone of bitterness in this hogwash that resembles its most passionate 'poster child', Karl Marx. I get where they are going with such a statement, but it boils down to a horribly false interpretation and even poorer analogies. Marxist contend that one's accomplishment owes some kind of debt to others. In other words, a lion's kill owes his spoils to the scavenger, when in fact, they too benefit from the kill without the effort or risk. Marxist want badly to parse the lion's share. However, one's plentiful success actually creates opportunity and peripheral benefits to be recognized and seized. The fact that we 'use each other' is a mutual benefit to all in both nature and capitalism. How one seizes that opportunity determines the level of one's success. I never heard Muhammad Ali say, “We're the greatest!” His coaches, parents, and sparing partners didn't stand at the podium for their gold medals, and championship belts. However, droves have benefited from Ali's career and trade mark. Many were given due credit for helping him hone his ability. His family, and their ancestors will and should benefit from his life achievements for years to come because they are 'his' legacy. Ali carved that benefit out for them. The 'effort and risk' belong to no one but Muhammad Ali. He trained his body, and he did the fighting. Those who made their contribution to his success, from his promoters to his challengers benefited in a number of ways, and how they used that to advance their own careers rested solely upon their own 'efforts and risks'. And yes, one could also say there may have been an element of 'luck' in Ali's career. So Obama and Warren are fools to believe that Ali, Oprah, Jobs, Ford, and countless other success stories somehow owe tithing to anyone who touched their garment. Fans, employees, and institutions all benefit from the very example of these achievers. Would it be kind or righteous to acknowledge those who believed in your abilities? Sure it would, but it shouldn't be regulated by government or expecting of charity. They owe their success to opportunity if anything at all. Opportunity is the only thing any government should thrive to encourage. Yet even when they don't create an even playing field, achievers find a way. In ups or downs, the achiever brings his or her game. As my mother used to tell me as a child, “If you can't be the Oak at the top of the hill, be a bush in the valley. But be the best little bush in the valley.”

Do you think they (the white establishment) brought Jackie Robinson into Major League Baseball simply because they wanted equality for blacks. Think again. The negro leagues had dozens of Jackie Robinson's. Their great talent was recognized by capitalists that knew that fans of any color would want to see incredible athletes perform. Jack Johnson and Jessie Owens were a few earlier examples of this truth. Sure it was becoming vogue to join in the civil rights movement by Robinson's time, but it was money (capitalism) that was ready to put forth the 'effort and risk' to bring black and white fans to the ball parks, radios, and televisions in order to draw in capital from ticket sales, concessions, souvenirs, and advertising endorsements. It was no different than the music industry. Why have two leagues competing when it makes money-sense and moral-sense to do away with bigotry? When blacks stopped using the buses in Memphis, it nearly killed the industry there. Capitalism was the greatest engine in the world to put an end to bigotry and racism. Anybody's dollar is worth as much as anybody else dollar whether it's a bus seat in Tennessee or a seat at Lakers' game in LA. Segregation also eventually gave way to business sense and morality. Profit is color blind. It could also care less what your gender is, what your sex is, or what your faith is, or how much money is in your pocket as long as you hand it over for the service or product you wish to acquire. If profiting financially can initiate change and civility through a bit of greed, than it can finally allow some moral reality to grow in our hearts. That is why Jesus 'fed the belly to open the ears'. It is admittedly backwards, but opportunity undeniably brought about positive and willful change. If ending corruption in government were a true aspiration, capitalism could pump out more than enough wealth to benefit all peoples. Any other engine could not make this claim.

Socialism/Communism would have attempted this same kind of change by force or elimination. This creates lasting animosities within any ideological model. Our Civil War created animosities that have lasted until today, and the Obama administration has done all it can to reopen these scars. Marxists models have killed more people on the earth than disease. That is why they were adopted and implemented by New World elites who control people and resources. They encourage and allow these ideologies to happen by design. Funding and abetting revolution through things like assassination, blackmail, strikes, labor unions, a controlled media, and instigating division by agitation. Lenin and Stalin in Russia, Mao in China, Pol Pot in Cambodia, Castro in Cuba and South America have pitted class against class, ethnicity against ethnicity, religion against religion, and ideology against ideology. Like the National Socialists of Germany, it invites dictatorship of the worst kind. In the beginning you may get a seemingly harmless Bernie Sanders promising the moon and stars (for free), and then you end up with Kim Jong Un once the old lying bastard dies. Get a load of that Bern. It's happening today with our left leaning government and the elite global cabal that are manipulating these socialist principles to get their New World Order. If you think their end game is to help minorities, the poor, and Bruce Jenner, you're sadly delusional. Once they use their brain-washed student robots, illegal aliens, disgruntled blacks, gays, transgenders, atheists, and food stamp recipients to obtain the power to disembowel our Constitution, it will be 'sayonara' to all the above. Their true feelings toward these demographics are that they are “useless eaters” and a financial liability to their New World economy. Therefore they will feel no guilt in the orchestrated and systematic slaughter through chaos and disease that awaits those who have blindly endorsed their 'Progressive' goals. These folks will be thrown under the proverbial bus. No one will be held accountable, as we have seen in scandal after scandal in the past 8 years.

Since the largest cities contain the bulk of the above, they'll be trapped within its borders when the troubles begin. When the lights go out from some bogus terrorist attack, or phony socialist-backed grievance movement, 'man-induced' global change, or retaliatory atomic missile strike; cities will become nothing but bloody train wrecks. Likely, UN troops and our own military will enforce martial law and no one will enter or leave the metro-bonfire until it is assessed that enough population has died to suit the Order's thirst for equilibrium. Meanwhile and during all the mayhem, revolutionaries, Constitutional fanatics, writers, philosophers, conspiracy theorists, and religious leaders will likely be hastened away to death camps in the middle of the night. Prisoners will be executed in their prison cells by their own guards and inmates, or perhaps unleashed upon the nearest population. These things will occur all over the world. When it all blows over, the earth will be less populated, there will be one authoritative world government, new rules, plenty of empty real estate (especially in the slums because they will have burned down their own neighborhoods as they did in Baltimore), and blame will fall to the empty chair. Those surviving will gladly endorse the Brave New World. The engine of capitalism will begin running again, and the Earth will be in harmony once more.

Hopefully, all the corruption and waste will have died with all those who were sacrificed. The world will begin again, shiny and new. Prosperity and understanding will rule the day, and we'll be no wiser that those who stirred the crap in the first place, were the architects of our present peace. It is reminiscent of the movie, The Watchmen, where Dr. Manhattan takes the blame for the seemingly diabolical Adrian Veidt. In an amusing display of West Coast bias, the villains in the movie were (of course), the capitalists and the conservatives (Lee Iacocca and Nixon). Yet, equally awkward is that Veidt, the obviously gay superhero (in the movie version not the comic strip), who has the brains to hatch up this intricate New World Order plot, is also, in the end, a pacifist. I can't make this shit up folks. No doubt that Adrian was likely a vegan as well. Only in Hollywood, only in leftist Hollywood. This is the Marxist version of my nightmare scenario, keeping the masses ignorant to the end. In The Watchmen, all that Adrian Veidt did, all the assassinating of other superheros, the betrayal of Dr. Manhattan, the plotting with corrupt politicians and corporations, and even the unavoidable killing of his own beloved pet, was justified. Marxist's believe that the 'ends justify the means'. Adrian pulls it off. His deception brings the change the world needed (well kind of), and Dr. Manhattan bows to Veidt's gay-pride genius and allows the blame to fall upon his own blue shoulders for the betterment of the new world that has come. Hollywood used its artistic license to paint the right picture, but with a Marxist brush. This too was intentional, because the New World Order has always manipulated the tools of capitalism and socialism. These and other things have to be in conflict with each other to produce the final result. The Watchmen and other movies of this generation are preparing minds to behave in the appropriate way.

Leftist professors have dominated our hallowed halls of education long enough now that our children are singing the praises of socialism, while much of the world have witnessed its demise. Those greatly influenced by Marxism, like the Progressive movement (crony-capitalist), are using the engine of capitalism in a controlled way to fund their fragile economies, and keep their masses somewhat pacified until the NWO can be locked into place. Now it is the socialist elements of the West that are stirring turds with Russia and the Middle East. Putin's seemingly bad actions are mostly due to the constricting behavior of the US led NATO and UN which Putin is interpreting as aggression. I'm not certain, but it seems Putin is the last conscious hold-out to the New World Order and wants nothing to do with it. Ironically, the Russians are actually doing more to rid the world of ISIS, and are coming to the aide of Christians in Middle East more than US is willing to do. All this, while Obama is showing unprecedented favor toward radical Islam in his dealings with Iran, Syrian refugees, and limited military aide to Kurds in northern Iraq. The present administration is doing nothing about the atrocities being experienced by Christians in the Middle East. Russia is constantly trying to adjust, and though Putin has tried to speak out about the dirty dealings of the US under Obama, the UN, and with NATO, western news agencies (controlled by the NWO elitists) are not reporting it. Only on the internet do you see the explanations for Putin's actions as explained by Putin himself, but even then you have to be curious enough to search for these responses. In my opinion, non-communist Russia, and our left leaning US government have switched identities. Obama has reached out to all our former enemies like the Castro's of Cuba, communist China, and the Mullah's of Iran, while thumbing his nose to Putin, because Vlad refuses to become a cog in the NWO machine. Putin either can't see the genius 'end from the means', or he doesn't trust in it all together. He's not drinking the Kool-Aid. He doesn't feel the love. None of these world leaders do. They are reacting from their instilled ideologies and bias, just as the NWO elites are counting on them to do. None of them are leaders. They are ingredients of the New World recipe that are all expendable in time.

We have so sterilized the world stage through division among cultures, religion, race, sex, gender, and ideologies, that no one can be held accountable for their words, crimes, backroom dealings, treaties, and alliances. Blame now falls on a stadium full of empty chairs from lack of accountability. Guilt and wrongdoing are subject to spin and the mass support and loyalty of political fan clubs. It's the perfect storm. The world is a bubbling cauldron, simmering to the Order's culinary discretion. Soup's on for all of us. The sweet of Capitalism and the sour of Marxism creating a succulent new dish that can only be appreciated by the Order's puppet-master chefs and kitchen helpers. Yes, the end will justify the means I guess. The Marxist followers will be led to their demise, as planned. It was the perfect ideological tool to herd the parasites, useless eaters, and rogues roaming at the fringes and outside of the norm. This is their opinion, and not my own. They'll also have no use for their corrupt political tools and crooked officials that they once needed to guide the lost masses. They will not enter the Order's new Promised Land. There will be no need of them there. Their usefulness will be no more.

The tainted porridge is nearly prepared, and every one of us will partake in digesting at least a bit of the contrived slop. Some will walk away from the table, and some will die over their bowls. Some will have a belly ache and recover, while others will writhe in horrific pain and finally expire. Nothing about it will be right, humane, or moral; but the 'end will definitely justify the New World means'. Those who survive will be so exhausted and thankful to be alive, that blame will be the furthest thought from their minds. They'll be perfectly content to move onward with life in this new different light. The NWO elites will congratulate themselves just as M.R. Behr once eluded to in his poem, ILLUMINATI, “...above a field of heroes, traitors and sacrificial lambs.” The New World planners will once more get out the engine of capitalism, kick-start it, and begin producing golden eggs again. However, this time it will be under a new universal idea. Better? Worse? Welcome to the Great Plan.

The Yard by Mikha'el R. Behr

The Yard

I once could see, we clearly disagreed,
even though you looked like me.

And, some who had not looked like me,
at times, I found we could agree,

on issues, and formalities steeped
in years of commonality.

But then the riots came, as
fringes worked their wedge between

the realm of peace and sanity,
dominion given to what our eyes can see

that I look not like you, nor you like me,
our mantras shout, "Bring death to thee!"

Now primitive it must all seem,
that morality dwells only in our dreams,

and paradise held in ill regard
has diminished to a lonesome prison yard;

where survival's defined by trust in skin
instead of the people we were within.

Reduced by hatred that divides each other,
the thickness of blood, the thinness of water.

                                     - M.R. Behr