To Q or Not to Q?

To Q or Not to Q?

Well, that has become the question, hasn't it? Q itself might answer the question like this. “Think logically.” Indeed, one should think logically. Sometimes we have to rise above a situation in order think clearly. In rising, somewhat like a hot air balloon, all the tethers fall away that bind our thoughts, and we drift to an elevation where we can assess the situation without the distraction of the 'noise' below. In short time, we find that the whole Q phenomena, and all the hoop-la that surrounds it, is much like a lot of other things, that can neither be definitively proven or disproved. This condition could last an eternity. Regardless of Q's success or failure in what may happen historically, we might only ever know his/her/its Q-essence. Excuse me, I hate being PC, and will thus identify Q with the once, universal, he and take the chance that I will offend a few women and neuters by referring to Q as being male. So, lets examine what folks are saying in general about Q.

Q is a PsyOp

For those unfamiliar with the term, a PsyOp is a military abbreviation for Psychological Operations. In short, we called it a mind-fuck when I was serving. Psychological Operations are yet another tactical tool in the military's vast arsenal (or bag of tricks) that are used to defeat an enemy. PsyOps have enjoyed a number of successes, regardless of what some US and other military intelligence officers will tell you. If a PsyOp doesn't work, it was simply the 'wrong bait for the wrong fish'. There is a constant type of PsyOp occurring at all times against US citizens and the people of the world. We have been programmed continually since the day we were born. Every commercial you have ever heard, every pep session you have attended, any military training you've had, athletic training you've endured, any media (TV show, movie, book, play, etc.,) you've experienced, any sign you've ever read, and signal you've ever reacted to or even noticed, every authority you've acknowledged, or uniform you've recognized are all akin to PsyOps that demand something from you. These things use as many of our senses (conscious and unconscious) as possible, to manipulate a response that is intended to direct us toward a purpose. This purpose will serve to the advantage of the manipulator/s. As you can see from my long list, not all kinds of PsyOps are harmful to you, though their intent is to manipulate your mind as to result in producing a particular behavior. A PsyOp needs a manipulator, and a control or target. The manipulator is purpose driven.

The Q concept has been a bit elaborate to have been a hoax, or a LARP, though I suppose someone or number of someones could be purpose driven enough to pull off a mind-screw of such magnitude. However, would the purpose of merely exposing us as a bunch of gullible fools, justify so much time, resources, effort, and planning? The attention to such incredible detail is in itself a hallmark of a PsyOp whose design is to gain something much larger than an elaborate prank. Either way, Q has, as a PsyOp already fulfilled its requirement of directing a response. If nothing else, the expectation that Trump is attempting to change an evil world, has now gotten a huge shot in the arm. The operation has at least had the appearance of a tremendous amount of strategic planning. All these high profile people are being trashed with accusations of satanism and pedophilia, and though it is not being addressed in the mainstream media, it is all over the internet. These are the same high profile people that sue for defamation at the drop of a hat. However, Q tossed a hot potato into this crowd and none of them want to hang on to it for fear their hands are gonna get burnt. It's destroying them, but they can't address it legally because the discovery alone, could leave them hanging from a post by their necks. The result has been that they are totally ignoring the career killing, power decapitating, and character assassinating accusations leveled at them by numerous internet bloggers through Q's drops. Where do you go to get your reputation back? You challenge the charges in the same court that might find that the accusations against you are holding water. That is why they are ignoring the problem all together. It would be out of sight, out of mind, if they could only stop the chatter. Those who haven't yet thrown in the towel, are holding out that this Trump/Q thing will go away. Their silence is deafening. Their silence is telling.

We Took the Bait, Now What?

So we all swallowed the hook. Yes all of us, naysayers and believers of Q. Jerome Corsi lost faith, but he hasn't gone away. Now he is bent on solving the mystery, or, is he part of a still developing Q PsyOp? Ah, you didn't see that coming did you? You better read the proceeding article: Revealing the Great Plan. Certainly, Corsi could be serving a part of a bigger picture, but in reality he aids the 'Q curiosity' by providing a home for those who would pooh on Q (pun intended). Before, the naysayers weren't paying much attention because they never bought into the Q narrative anyway. But guess what? Now the naysayers have a place to go (Corsi & INFOWARS with Alex Jones) to do their naysayer thing. It takes us back to the old days of the liberal news monopoly. Now we realize the PsyOp that liberal news was, since everyone has shown their true colors as a result of Trump becoming president. Conservatives might recall the excitement of Fox News when it first came out. It gave all we conservatives a long awaited 'home'. None of us took ABC, CBS, NBC, or even CNN as having any of our political interests in mind. We had all drifted back to conservative radio and publications that satisfied our political pang. To create a perceived 'conservative news haven' was brilliant of a perceived globalist like Rupert Murdoch. Fox has long been #1 in the ratings, because people in the US are really more conservative than liberal. You'd think that would have created more conservative news networks if it followed the same logic of any other popular television program. How many NCIS shows does one need? And didn't Pawn Stars give birth to at least two other shows, and inspired a few others on other networks? Why, because people watched it and networks took the cue. Give the public more of what they like. However, it is not so true with the news cycle. That PsyOp calls for more liberal news (for the few) and less conservative news (for the many). It's crowd control, or at least it was before Trump entered the picture. Now we see what the purpose of Fox News had always been. Sure there are true conservatives like Hannity, Tucker, and Judge J.P., but they are even somewhat hobbled by Murdoch and center-left talking heads, like Shep Smith, possibly Bret Baier, Juan Williams, and others that keep the phony Russiagate/Stormy Daniels talking points going. Anyway, since Fox News has been ground zero for conservatives watching the news, globalist have succeeded somewhat in capturing that audience as a marketing herd for their advertising, and garnered perhaps a few political dissenters that might side with some of the more 'fair and balanced' host/guests who get to articulate their arguments against Trump every night.

Likewise, Jerome Corsi now serves this similar purpose. He's created a platform for Q dissenters, which has now cleverly captured the naysayers. Always remember, even bad publicity is in many ways, good publicity. It forces people (though nonbelievers) to deal with Q, keeping him in the limelight and keeping him relevant. Very, very smart. It only draws more attention to the Q phenomena, which would have always had its dissenters and its advocates anyhow. You see how great that little PsyOp worked, with or without Corsi's awareness? Pretty smooth. I quit watching Fox, once I could see that they too, were not interested in any of what I perceived to be bigger headlines. It is now abundantly clear what the purpose of the Fox News PsyOp always was, just as it is now clear (since Trump was elected) that McCain, Graham, McConnell, Ryan and a slew of others, were globalist RINOs all along. Recall, too, that it was Jerome Corsi who early on, pointed out that Q was indeed with the President, because one of the photos Q posted was of a Monte Blanc pen resting on a desk top. Corsi, being the big-shot that he is, confirmed that not only did Trump use a Monte Blanc pen, but that he recognized the desk top as being one he was familiar with; that being the presidential desk (top) at Camp David. That is a pretty astute observation (wink, wink). It must have left an impression on Corsi to recall the top of a desk as being one at Camp David. Corsi has always let folks know that he can get through to the president, and he has also apparently been a guest at Camp David at one time or another. Name dropper. Socialite. Ass hat (as Deplorable McAllister might say). So, it was either President Trump's pen or it wasn't. Likewise, it was either the entity Q, that posted the photo or it wasn't. Think logically. Corsi now claims Q is a farce because his feelings got hurt. That could be a cover. Corsi is either appearing to be a putz, or in fact he truly is one. However, since he is staying-in as a heel, Corsi is still an active servant to the perceived Q PsyOp, whether he knows it or not.

What Q Asks of Us, is Little

“Trust the plan.” “Enjoy the show.” Often he'll request that we say a prayer for brave military operatives, for the president, or even the people of the world. Q may imply that we spread the good news, that things are being done. I might say this, “Either things are getting done or they aren't.” It can't be anything else. As a PsyOp, what would the purpose of these few requests be? Moreover, how does it serve the manipulator of the operation? Thus far, the PsyOp of Q, has only functioned as a liaison between supposed 'goings on' to inform the anxious believer. As a by product, there has also arisen a camp of curious detractors and naysayers who keep the Q question open by allowing it legitimacy as either a trick, or an even more ill-intended counter-purpose. Normally, bullshit is ignored and dies out, or eventually withers away from neglect. Yet, Q is more likely to continue to gain attention in one way or the other in the future. The only purpose that that could serve, is to keep the notion of Q alive and allow it to grow legs. The thing Q is notorious for, is peaking our curiosity by his many questions through his various 'crumbs'. It forces us all to investigate all these topics (like adrenalchrome, for instance). We participate. Once we bite on the questions, we're hooked by the answers and possibilities that 'knowing' awards the participant. Child trafficking is either happening or it isn't happening. Plain and simple. Evil doers are drinking and eating the blood and flesh of children for their adrenalchrome, or they are not. Plain and simple. If the left and its liberal media are generators of fake news, than Q is slowly eating away at their only ace-in-the-hole. That ace is the negative onus that the left has placed upon the word, conspiracy. To the left, conspiracy is synonymous with fantasy. Past 'PsyOps' have conditioned us to lift conspiracy from its original literal meaning, and confuse the term by redefining it, and reducing its translation to pure lunacy. Entertaining the thought that people would conspire had become unpopular, unhealthy, worrisome, and nonproductive. We were to trust the authority of the media, and somehow believe that they themselves were not agents of manipulation. To avoid being an outcast, or appearing absurd, or ridiculous, we've shied away from 'conspiracy theories'. We have had to whisper our indifference among like-thinkers to avoid criticism. Q has been dissolving that stigma, by presenting common source bits for us to piece together like a puzzle. These hints or crumbs make us do our own homework, which in turn, affirms our own suspicions. It's now okay to reject media ridicule, because Q has directed you to credible, common sources, that defend the conspiracy you are investigating with reasonable facts. Now we can actually use the term as it was meant be be used. Conspiracy: 1.) A secret plan by two or more people to do something that is harmful or illegal. 2.) The act of secretly planning to do something that is harmful or illegal. Both Trump and Q have made it vogue to revisit long ridiculed conspiracy theories.

Q: Still Unacknowledged, Still Anonymous

For a still unacknowledged entity, Q is becoming quite a controversy. Though 'Q Bloggers' seem to notice subtle signs that Trump acknowledges Q, therefore legitimizing that he is an agent of the administration, Trump himself has never discussed the Q entity publicly. He likely never will either. Why should he? This is either what is causing the present Q controversy with Corsi/INFOWARS, or as I hinted earlier, Corsi/INFOWARS are part of the gig. The mainstream news isn't talking about it as far as I know. It doesn't serve them; however, if it could be made to look like it would serve the mainstream they might take the bait as well. And, just who would that serve for the media to take the bait? You guessed it...Q, and the PsyOp. Recall that any publicity is good publicity, especially when in pertains to a ghost, an anonymous, or a figment of one's imagination. Case in point, using something more real . The left has always hated conservative politicians and past republican presidents, but who did they rally behind when Trump called all of them out as globalists? That's right, the Bushes, and all the other globalist RINOs. Suddenly, liberals who bashed George 'W' as a retard through two terms, were empathizing with the former president because Trump had hurt Jeb's tender feelings during the election. Ah, it's true, the enemy of my enemy is truly my friend. What the present Q PsyOp might be shooting for, is something similar. Perhaps the mainstream will pile on the Q bashing train, but it will be to their own peril to acknowledge something that even the president isn't endorsing. Even the mention of Q in the mainstream media cycle, opens our public up to exploring Q out of their own curiosity. Borrowing a line from Julia Roberts in Pretty Woman, that would be a “Big Mistake.” For most of us who have followed Corsi and even Alex Jones, their outrage over Q's comment about being careful who you follow and that some covering Q are more geared for profit, than for advancing 'the movement', is a rather lame argument. In this game of espionage, you can never completely trust anyone or any thing. To put all your eggs in one basket is also a “Big Mistake”. Perhaps Corsi and Jones are pouting losers over being called out by Q. It doesn't effect what Trump or Q will do or say. While Q acknowledges Trump, Trump does not openly reciprocate. Corsi and Jones have not completely left the farm. They are still claiming there is a deep state plot. Q isn't going anywhere. He'll still post, and people will still follow his crumbs, because we are not essential to how ongoing operations will turn out (other than our prayers). “Sit back and watch the show.” “As the world turns.” This spat between the Corsi Camp and the Q Camp, is mere noise. Noise that draws people to the Q phenomena regardless if you are fan of him or not. Its Big Time Wrestling, daddy! It's the pretty boys vs. the heels. All the pissing and moaning is intended to pack the house. 'Think logically.' The PsyOp works. The action is real, even if the outcome is staged. If it weren't, Corsi and Jones would just walk away and continue their own 'deep state' narrative (another PsyOp). As with any case of controlling the mind, perception becomes reality. I might also mention, at this time, that there are many great bloggers interpreting Q drops. I listen to several, but one in particular has a certain talent and disposition for interpreting Q in a way that I think even Q would approve. This blogger goes by the 'handle' of Praying Medic. In the world of interpreting all things Q, the medic is as loyal, focused, and informative as any of those dedicated to the movement.

Thou Protesteth Too Much

At this point in the article it seems appropriate to reflect on the works of William Shakespeare, which were PsyOps of their own. Though ancient, their influence can not be underestimated, even as they may apply today. The irony is that Shakespeare was likely not the author of the works accredited to him. Who wouldn't want to claim the genius of even one of these classics? Over several hundred years there has arisen a few likely candidates that had the panache to compile such an anthology of brilliance. Sir Francis Bacon comes to mind, and perhaps John Dee and some others. The biggest irony however, is that Shakespeare was known to be a mere stage hand who died in poverty. I think I read one account that not only was he impoverished, his estate consisted of perhaps only a tiny home and a bed. It is thought that he might well have been illiterate. So much for the famous bard. The works, it seems, where of such great importance that the true author must remain a mystery for fear it might taint the works themselves. Historically, we now know much of Bacon and Dee, and their connections to secret societies. Shakespeare, though a real person, might just as well been a pseudonym for nobody, for he was no one in particular. He was all of us. He was a commoner. He profited nothing by being given authorship of arguably some of the greatest literary works ever written and performed. He might well have been Barabbas, or the dead tramp hero of Operation Mincemeat. There is a reason that one would distance themselves from something profound, and place that credit to another. These works were so important that the motive behind their creation, was not to be risked by openly examining the life and mind of the true author/s and possibly reveal their true intent.

Though perhaps less profound than the works of Shakespeare, this is what I believe Q was referring to concerning profiteering from the movement. Q didn't seek out the mainstream media, the Corsi's or the Jones's. He delivered the goods to the 'stage hand'. He revealed his wares to the guy behind the curtain, the anons and the common people who have been following his 'drops' in the US and other countries around the globe. Whether or not Corsi and Jones are on board with Q makes no difference, but I have to say, borrowing a line from Hamlet (apparently uttered by his mother), “The Lady doth protest too much, methinks.” Surely, Corsi and Jones could be a bit more believable in their acting, if they were indeed acting. Jones has some experience acting, and I believe he possess an actor's guild card (I might be wrong on that), but did you ever see such a pitiful crying act by Jones as when Trump went along with bombing in Syria. It's a classic worth watching again. Alex went overboard, and probably for his own entertainment. He's prone to such capers. That's why I kinda get a kick out him and the whole INFOWARS PsyOp (which I have theory about). Then there is Jerome Corsi, who up until his tantrum over being implicated in profiteering from the Q movement, had appeared to be a balanced intellect. It seemed a bit of an overreaction to Q's slight criticism that didn't even remotely name Corsi. I found Corsi's Q analysis or blog rather boring in its format, though I've had nothing against Corsi. He and Jones appear to still be fighting the 'deep state', though their egos are deflated for not being allowed special nursing privileges from Q's abundant information teet. Sour grapes it seems, but no harm. Remember, Q is like the wind. You can't rope the wind. Q is giving away, what they'd like to sell. I'll say it a final time and not mention it again. It doesn't matter if Corsi or Jones are on the Q train, as it could be part of the act. At worse, they wanted the keys to the kingdom. If it does turn out to be egg-on-their-faces, they're both resilient. They'll get over their insecurities or their own careers might suffer.

The Bright Side

The positive impact of the Q phenomenon, is that he has given us hope that things are being done. If things weren't being done as Q claims, well than, such is life! We were doing nothing prior to his arrival to the Chans, but scouring the internet and we'll continue to do so. He's certainly tested our patience as well and the enemy's. You think the bad guys (black hats) aren't tuning in as well? You think Q hasn't been mind-screwing them with some disinformation and observing their reactions? If indeed it is a military operation, you can bet your sweet ass that he and his team of operators are pulling out all the stops. Let them do their thing, how ever long they take to do it. Sure, I want to see the high profile arrests. I want to see Trump excel. I want children around the world to be able to be children, and not satanical sacrifices or sex slaves to politicians, CEOs, and Hollyweirdos. Even if it is only a fraction of what Q claims to be going on, then certainly we should be rejoicing. Q has prompted us toward a Great Awakening. Q didn't owe us explanations, or crumbs, or his true identity. Corsi stated many times that he thought he knew who Q was. Well, if he knows, then he likely knows his politics and that he is not a communist. That's ludicrous. The bright side is that the Q PsyOp, like any PsyOp or mind persuasion-type operation, has both a manipulator and purpose which it serves. “Think logically.” What do we gain in throwing Q out with the bath water? It is this simple folks. Q and his crew are doing something, or they are not doing something. What were we all doing before we got wrapped up in the Q phenomenon? Nothing. That makes Q a bonus, not a liability. Think faith. Think hope. That is what makes me, 'stick with the plan.' As one begins to die, folk's start to ask you if you've been saved in the blood of Jesus Christ. Well, let's say you haven't been saved. What harm would it cause to have that bit of assurance on your side before your last breath? I'd trust in Q even if he were a comic book character. At least he's consistent. Q asks for so very little. “Pray for your country. Pray for Trump. Pray for our loyal servicemen and women. Be patriots. Sit back and watch the show.” It doesn't seem like a whole hell of a lot to ask, does it?