More Conjecture On The Great Plan

More Conjecture On The Great Plan

Believe it or not, some projects or programs are made, built, developed, or conceived so that they can be easily dismantled when their usefulness is no longer needed. These inlaid components of deconstruction equate to much prior planning, and serve a future purpose. Recycling serves such a purpose. Certain materials are intentionally used in some products that will serve a present purpose, only to be used again in the same way or in a different application. Strategically, some bridges and overpasses may be built in a manner so that they can easily be destroyed by planned demolitions (explosives), so these routes cannot be used by advancing military invaders. Likewise, even a mission can contain numerous contingencies, should elements of that plan be aborted in order for smooth transition when things go wrong. Think of it as a Plan B. If there is a Great Plan that is guided by an Illuminati, or some other form of cabal, then it would stand to reason that any and all contingencies would have been accounted for within their intricate and ancient scheme. What would they add into such a mix, so as to transcend smoothly, and to account for any and all obstacles or resistance? I've already described how the true Order can own both sides of any equation, as I set forth in Revealing The Great Plan, but what's contained within that aggregate slab? If the Great Plan works the way I have theorized, there would have been a 'latent virus' injected into every tentacle of the their all encompassing Kraken, or every strand of their spider's networking web that the Order might construct. I've only slightly touched on this likely scenario within The Plan, as it may exist within the media and the entertainment world. To fully understand this element, and so that I don't have to rehash the entire past article (Revealing The Great Plan), I would encourage digesting it before reading further. Essentially, if The Plan does indeed encompass both Darkness and Light, all facets would be set into motion by the same hand to accomplish a larger purpose. That purpose is their endgame, their long awaited Kingdom Come. First, lets make sense of Hollywood, the jewel of the entertainment world.

Hollywood Babylon

In the Statler Brothers' song, Movies, there is a prophetic lyric: “The movies are great medicine, thank you Thomas Edison for giving us the best years of our lives.” Indeed, Hollywood has delivered their payload of enjoyment to our unsuspecting lives. Perhaps a bit more than we actually realize. Though, I wouldn't set forth to say that Hollywood was solely established as a platform for the New World Order, I have no doubt that they were salivating at the prospects of opportunity to manipulate Sin City's ability to enchant the goyim psyche. It was certainly an economical way to reach an all too eager populace into escapism, and the wonderment (and influence) of celebrity and stardom. Even as far back as the Romans, they understood that forms of entertainment helped the social fabric of their empire, and thus the many amphitheaters and coliseums, which exist today in other more modern forms. An idle mind is the the devil's workshop, so entertainment is a win/win for citizenry and government. Entertainment has the ability to uplift a sometimes mundane existence, because it occupies our minds, and it allows for fantasy. It also can help push ideas and agendas by cleverly interweaving messages put forth in a creative, agreeable manor, which is so typical of influencing one's behavior or thoughts. Hollywood, like a big yellow bug-light, attracted the mob, swindlers, hustlers, dreamers, artists, amusement seekers, and outcasts who sought fame, fortune, and exploitation. Just as a smelly turd attracts flies, so too were scoundrels drawn to Hollywood. Yet, even though Hollywood was perhaps always a cesspool for pure evil, when the coterie behind The Great Plan interjects themselves within any scene, the forces of both good and evil roll in on the same coin. And, as I have speculated many times, this machine is not conscious of all its moving parts, save for the entity or entities that have their proverbial hand on the throttle. In our lifetimes, the evil element of the true Order has been in the dominant role to serve its purpose, both in Hollywood and through many other means. However, if you are paying attention during a Hollywood production, you will often see many truths underlying the larger action of their scripts. These truths are like implanted 'viruses' that serve an obscure purpose. There are good things that flow through the script's plot that seem to miss the eye of the evil schemers that would edit them. They may even deem these 'inoculations' as harmless, since their larger malignant messages are so much more visible. However, like a tiny sparkling diamond in a pile of dark dung, goodness resonates. It's positive presence is always far more profound against the backdrop of negative propaganda or deceit.

Take the movie, The Watchmen, for instance. This one is rich with the subtle good and elaborate evil of Hollywood manipulation. The evil in this movie contains a much intended bias or dark tone throughout the film, while often those elements of goodness or humanity assume minor roles to the film's smatterings of negative propaganda. In The Watchmen, all the villains were initially established at the onset of the movie. The story is set during the Nixon administration, and by the movie's end they are naturally ragging on an up and coming future candidate, Ronald Reagan. Liberal Hollywood has always slung mud at conservatives because of Nixon's Watergate scandal, yet even that debacle barely makes a blip on the radar screen, to the decades of liberal scandals yet to be officially uncovered. Lee Iaccoca and others are portrayed as greedy (conservative) industrialists, but the movie's intended hero (named Adrian Veidt, aka Ozymandias) is a pacifist genius, Bruce Wayne-type of guy, who has a diabolical solution to end world conflict that is all too familiar among socialist and Marxist camps. This solution is to fabricate a boogie-man for the world to unite against. Never mind that Veidt's solution is a staged hoax that will kill millions, which is what he deems necessary to promote lasting peace. But that's okay with him, the population are goy (sheep), and Veidt (an elitist) knows what is best for them. This perceived visionary, was only one of many comic book superheros that were in the movie, but he is presented as an 'evolved being' due to his genius. Libs in Hollywood, even have Dr. Manhattan (often portrayed as a god) concede to the genius of Adrian Veidt (a man in a super suit) once he successfully executes his insane plot. Hollywood also hints that Veidt is conspicuously gay, through stereotypical visual cues, without risking his 'manly' superpowers of brilliance, speed, agility, and power. Viedt was a man driven by his cause, with no apparent interest in women, who was steeped in development, technology, art, history, style, expensive tastes, and impeccable grooming. Virtue signaling knows no bounds in Hollywood.

On the flip-side of this dark narrative, we were able to find compassion for even the most despicable of the film's superheros (the Comedian), appreciate the morality of a twisted mind like Rorschach, and understand that wonderful people can emerge from even the most dysfunctional of unions (Laurie Jupiter), as pointed out by Dr. Manhattan during he and Laurie's private conversation on Mars. So, there was a lot good going on for the viewing movie goer to absorb during this film that had to be present to move the script along. However, the one-sided political and social agendas were constantly hammering away at our psyche during the entire experience. I easily detect these manipulative techniques, but for many others who don't recognize them, notions are still implanted into the mind to be dealt with subliminally, and persuasive techniques are employed that may alter, embolden, ignite, or reinforce ones perspective. For those who recognize the manipulation, it is an entirely different experience. It is one of acknowledging the less obvious, and then analyzing it. I am not too uncertain that these revelations weren't intended to be found, because identifying these 'crumbs' open other dimensions of awareness.

Another such movie was Hero. Though the message was making a case for 'One China', it might as well have been promoting (in the negative sense) a 'New World Order'. In short, the movie's main character was a hero because he had the greatest opportunity and skill to accomplish the assassination of what would become the first unifying leader of China, from a land mass of several independent warring states. This hero's journey was interesting, and much more involved than I was able to comprehend initially, due to the fact that the movie was in Chinese, with English subtitles. It is very difficult to have to read, and catch all the nuances of a film at the same time. However, despite the fact that the despot wins the day, and the would-be-assassin (the hero) allows himself to be sacrificed because he decided it best not to kill China's future leader, the hero once again 'evolves' in his thinking from all his previous encounters. He even accepted his death, because after all, rules are rules, even though he spared the would-be emperor. Spare him or not, plotting against the conqueror was a death sentence, or so liberal Hollywood (and Red China) would think. I ration that the viewing audience is supposed to accept this liberal logic as fact. So, by movie's end the hero is viewed as a martyr, a symbol of just how close the Chinese came to having a 'diverse' China, rather than a China run by a despot. I guess it all depends on your own political philosophy. We were also left with a message, that only in heaven are we truly free from tyranny (which on earth is deemed essential or necessary). So the theme they were selling in Hollywood was that, on earth things must be one way, and in the great beyond our spirit will experience true freedom. How convenient? Most of these propagandist don't even believe in an afterlife, or judgment after death. That was my interpretation, but I've read other interpretations on the movie Hero that seem academic. I'd have to see the film again with a good English translation to be able to confirm my own thoughts, but the movie certainly struck me in the manner which I described. Free men don't like despotism, but then again, we haven't had despots that are eternally benevolent either. History has had it's share of good ones and bad ones. The movie message also hints that destinies (I guess, Manifest Destiny) will be played out, and most of us are mere pawns in the game. There are many, many more movies that have these good/bad elements in them, and they are very much planned into these films as every movie is an opportunity to get inside your mind, be it for good or ill intentions. At the present, most seeds planted from the Hollywood industry have been intended to enslave us, divide us, and undermine faith. They are programming us socially to accept a certain ideology.

The Evil Media

Without a doubt, we've discovered over time that our once, 'free speaking/thinking' media, is now no better than the old Soviet rag known as Pravda. In fact, our press is a whole hell-of-lot sneakier than Tass, because controlling our minds through media in the US called for owning the whole Monopoly board while appearing as many independent media entities. Once you own the whole block you can make the rules no matter how many houses line the street. Not only is it true with newsprint, it is also true with television network news and cable. We think because we have a number of choices to choose from, that we are getting a variety of diverse newsworthy reporting. We aren't, no matter what flavor you prefer your news to be. The only difference is the propaganda meter. They all report the same crap determined to be of utter most importance. The only difference is the spin. Depending on the audience tuning in, the Order will effectively inform and influence that segment of the population on how to interpret the events being posted. They control the narrative. They control the content. They control your mind. You decide how you want to swallow your news from the spoons that CNN, Fox, MSNBC and others provide for you. Being conservative, I used to only be able to stomach Fox News, but now I'd rather tune in to CRTV.com. The future for the news cycle will one day be mostly online bloggers and websites. The distrust in all television media and television news commentary have pushed most people to dig through less conventional alternatives to try to interpret what is really going on in the world.

A Shining Example

Surely, anyone who has watched a television drama or cinematic portrayal of cops-in-action, have seen an example of the Good Cop, Bad Cop interrogation. This is yet another example of how one entity may contain a form of both benevolence and evil, just exactly in the same way I have proposed that the true Order at work in the world is neither a good order or a bad order, but rather two-sides of the same coin. I have advocated that within such an order, one hemisphere of this 'figurative body' is unaware of the other; yet share a not-so-common brain (a genius single entity or group).

So, when law enforcement play their Good Cop/Bad Cop game, both cops have the same mission. They want a confession, or at the least, a useful lead to pursue their case. One uses kindness. “Can I get you a soda? Would you like a cigarette? Look, I empathize with what you were going through., etc.” The other applies the heat. “You little son-of-a-bitch, I'll sweat you all night... I know you killed the girl. Your own friend turned on you this morning. You're made, so you better give me the real story or I'll see to it that you hang for the whole deal.” So, you try a little sweet, and if that doesn't produce the desired result, you take the sour approach. The single entity is the police department, and it's single goal (which is to break down the criminal's resistance), is accomplished via the two forces of nice and not-so-nice.

I'm now going to share a shining example (one of many) on how the true Order, which encompasses both forces of good and evil to obtain their ancient goal (The Great Plan), can disassemble what they themselves once assembled, in order to continue their plotted course. These examples are 'latent, built-in viruses' that lie dormant until a time that they must 'kill-off' one stage of their agenda to advance another. Enter William Milton Cooper. In his own small way, he was able to advance the true Order's business, as JFK did in a much larger scope. Both were tragic figures, casualties of a patient agenda that progresses through a series of actions and reactions. An equivalent to a Bill Cooper of yesterday, might be an Assange, or a Snowden of today. None of them had to be aware of their contribution, and likely none of them were pushed in any direct way by the Order to do what they did. Their qualities as human beings were simply utilized. Cooper who wrote the tell-all book, Behold A Pale Horse (in 1991), was a veteran of the Vietnam War. He served in two branches of the military during his career. It was his Naval experience that placed him in a position where he regularly saw Top Secret materials. He was a patriot by all manner of the definition of a patriot. He loved his country and his service, and he truly was a decorated war hero. He cherished the Constitution and the Bill of Rights to his own peril. I told his brief story in the article, Revealing The Great Plan, so I will not reiterate much of what I have already written. In his time in service, Cooper saw classified materials on a proposed operation of a plan called 'MindWar'. MindWar was to be a new approach to old PsyOp techniques, which were viewed outdated/ineffective for future wars and modern battlefields. It's possibilities were researched initially by two US Army officers, one of which was a junior officer at that time. While his superior officer's name is often forgotten (see Cooper's book), the other officer is quite well known to those who delve into conspiracy. This bizarre individual's name is Micheal Aquino, and he has been known for his open practice of Satanism, and activities as a Satanic Priest (mainly within the Temple of Set). I have a theory about Aquino, and I may get into that later. Anyway, Major (at the time of the MindWar memo) Aquino, and his superior officer (Col. Paul E. Vallely) were both involved in Army Intelligence, and were the ones who introduced the perceived advantages of MindWar goals over conventional PsyOps. A PsyOp is an accessory or 'force multiplier, which may still have useful applications; however, the MindWar is a strategy to which tactical warfare must conform to achieve its maximum effectiveness. In other words, it (MindWar) need be the main consideration before preceding into any conquest. MindWar is not a mere element within a strategy, as is the use of how a conventional PsyOp might be implemented. MindWar is (or should be in their assessment) the strategy, or format of all future battle plans. In simplest terms, I envision MindWar as a heart-to-heart talk that appeals mainly to the average-to-superior intellectual minds of any opposing force. Rather than attempting to fool the intellect of an opponent with PsyOps, the perceived pervasive force seeks to logically weaken the will of the would-be-combatant without tricks or deception. If the pervasive force can 'win' or even 'neutralize' the will of the minds of any given enemy's resistance, the impending military action can be either diverted, or be far less devastating to life and property. It doesn't always change an ideology, nor is that its intention, but it can lessen the resolve of more logical minds to take up arms and engage in battle. And lets face it, these are the same bulk of minds that lead those who are less intellectually adept, or who would follow ideologies blindly, or who are more prone to falling for the old 'banana peel slap-stick' of a conventional PsyOp. The MindWar however, is defined as 'deliberate' and 'aggressive'. It means business. The outcome of any commitment to conflict, can only be an all-out, overwhelming, decisive victory. All intent is above the table. All concerns are addressed, concessions are considered, and the resolve of the pervasive force will be made abundantly clear.

The MindWar memo or plan seems to have been conceived in perhaps the 1970s or early 80s, and adopts much of the old Roman mindset concerning conquest. However, was the MindWar concept ever implemented? Firstly, a common enemy of the MindWar had to be confronted and defeated. This enemy would not have been fully realized at the time of the memo I read from Cooper's book. The pair that concieved the memo/plan, attributed our loss of the Vietnam War to a greater PsyOp that they believed occurred as a consequence of our own operations. We know now, through sources like Q, and past conspiracies uncovered, that there are no consequences when media and politics are involved. MindWar is not a lukewarm approach, it's a shit-or-get-off -the-pot deposition. What the MindWar memo/plan hadn't considered was that elements in our own government, like the CIA and crooked politicians, were subverting and limiting our efforts toward decisive victory in Vietnam (and likely had done the same in past conflicts as well). We now know that the CIA greatly influences the content of the news cycle. It was the media's constant anti-war drum beat, that weakened the will of the US population, which eventually caved to the communists, and therefore sacrificed Vietnam, its people, and the region (Cambodia/Laos) to suffer by the millions to genocide, disease and cruelty. Crooked politicians, their policies, and their interests, tied the hands of generals and war planners, until a weary American public had determined that a victory in Vietnam, and the loss of our sons and daughters to a never ending war, wasn't worth continuing. We lost not to the communists in the end, but by the hand of our own shadow government that was working a PsyOp of their own on the American people through, assassinations, military-industrial-complex greed, crooked political policy, community agitation, subversive social movements, and through many mediums of propaganda. We sent our Dogs-of-War, into a conflict designed to make dark money, advance dark intelligence operations, and strengthen a shadow government that has no loyalty to any country, but to its own goal of evil manipulation, and suffering for the people of the world.

Somewhere in between introducing the MindWar memo/plan, and the discovery of these subversive entities within our own government, I believe that the MindWar concept was not only embraced, but systematically implemented at home and abroad, and the planned elimination of all these 'bad actors' would be approached in carefully executed stages. These 'bad actors' and organizations are now being dismantled, thanks in great part to the very Order that once allowed darkness to flourish unabated. One shinning example of the implementation of MindWar on a media front is INFOWARS, whose very name, I believe, was derived from the larger aforementioned operational philosophy. The INFOWARS slogan, There's a War On For Your Mind, is literally (war/mind) MindWar. There are many ironies in the connections to INFOWARS and the MindWar operation. The first bit of irony involves Bill Cooper. Prior to INFOWARS entering the scene on March 3, 1999, Cooper had a radio show called The Hour Of The Time. Likewise, Alex Jones, over time had hosted a number of venues. He had a call-in format, public access cable TV program, that evolved into a later radio broadcast called The Final Edition. Since that time, there has been the introduction of INFOWARS, NewsWars, and PrisonPlanet. At some point in the 1990's, Cooper was invited on to one of Jone's venues. A few years later, and only months before Cooper was gunned down, he made a scathing announcement about Alex Jones. Jones had apparently maligned Cooper on one of his later broadcasts, charging him of having a foul mouth and making false claims while being a guest on his show. Cooper explained that he was only on Jone's show once, and that the accusations were unfounded, and that Jone's was (and I'm paraphrasing) a “...pathetic, stinking little coward liar.”. The irony, as I see it, is that Cooper became a victim to an element of the very program he had witnessed in secret documents while in Naval Intelligence. A few decades later, Cooper would not recognize that the MindWar program had indeed been implemented, and that Jones might well have been groomed as one of many MindWar assets. Again, Jones as well as others, would not even have to know that they were cogs within a larger machine. Despite the Cooper/Jones spat, INFOWARS and Alex Jones have greatly aided the MindWar program. We know both Cooper and Jones have been successful, because of the way the opposition has defined these men and their activities. Wikipedia, a very biased non-profit organization in much the same light as the Southern Poverty Law Center, is a favored source for many searching for quick information online. They actually have often used the SPLC's opinions, when defining other (mainly conservative) groups or individuals. Wikipedia defines Cooper as a conspiracy theorist, and here's a new term for you, he was also defined as a militiatheoretician. Wikipedia charges much the same of Alex Jones. He is defined as a conspiracy theorist, and an alt-right conservative among other things. Jones' INFOWARS is defined as fake news, a term actually coined by the right concerning the liberal mainstream media. We all know that the MSM takes their marching orders in-part from the CIA and other shadow government figures. Trump pushed the 'fake news' moniker, and it has made a laughing stock of CNN and other MSM as people are awakening due to Q postings (another MindWar asset). So liberal outlets have been childishly repeating as strategy, the old nursery school chant, 'I am rubber, you are glue'. It is failing miserably. We have seen that nearly all the charges leveled at conservatives, are exactly what liberals are guilty of doing. Goebbels would be proud of American Liberalism. And to be clear, I am far more in favor of the dramatic rantings of INFOWARS, than the present liberal fake news, be it a asset of MindWar or not.

Special Delivery

Just as a rocket needs a few stages to project a payload into space, so too, has the true Order used the two forces of good and evil to propel us toward their desired destination. Though this seems to be as plain as the nose on our faces, there is still some confusion on where exactly this 'journey' takes us. Will we recognize the good guys from the bad guys at our journey's end? At the present, we as participants, have been offered only two choices or avenues toward our destiny. That began with a choice between the devil we knew (Hillary Clinton), and the devil we didn't know (Donald Trump). In my humble opinion, all that Trump has done thus far seems better than the alternative. Do we prefer MindWar with hands above the table, or the continued antics of negative PsyOps with hands under the table? In a way, it is like going willfully into a World Order with one's eyes open, or entering it in the unconscious state of blindness from which we seem to have only recently awoken. Was this the genius of the true Order's coveted strategy? A choice between a rock and a hard place? I can't be 100% sure. I am certain however, that the awaited package is going to be delivered, and there will be no option for it to be returned to sender. We are gettin' what were gettin'. What comes after is still anybody's guess. There's no turning back once all the bad actors are gone. And what of the void that will be left in its place? If Trump is real, and Q is real, my endorsement of that destiny remains under a condition that Trump and Q have good intentions. When MindWar succeeds against our enemies, and our citizenry wishes to return to business-as-usual, would returning to that option be logical? Might it invite the very conditions that lead us astray? Will we sure-up our Constitution in a manner as to abolish all corruption from our hallowed halls, or will the dream of our forefather's Republic have to be totally revamped? Perhaps we as citizenry will one day face our own MindWar ultimatum, where concessions are considered, concerns are addressed, and a will-bending logic will be leveled at us. Will we accept it? Will we trust its intentions are good?

All does actually revolve around the intent of the machine behind MindWar, or similar operations that the true Order could be using, because the Order seems for now to be focused on a cleanse. It isn't the Hero of the movie's namesake sacrificing himself to an effigy of Communist China, nor is it like Adrian Veidt advancing his diabolic plan to trick humanity into deeper lies in order make peace. These were underhanded techniques, and deceptive motives with hands under the table. What have we definitively learned about the true Order's modus operandi? Could it be as I suspect; two sides of the same coin? Have we not created our destiny from our own actions, provoked in part by deception? We've made good and bad decisions. We've sometimes caved to temptation and sin, and consequences have resulted from our choices. Dire consequences at times, through the manipulation of our own vices. Some have remained ridged and righteous. But, many have submerged so deeply into evil, that only a miracle from God could bring them back. Even our own earthly justice, can't ignore many of these heinous acts. There's plenty of blame to go around, but our condition collectively lies in our multitude of poor choices that delivered us to a place where humanity now needs intervention. We must concede that these forces (Good & Evil) are, and likely always will, escape the grasp of our comprehension. What we are able to comprehend however, is that light pushes darkness aside, and that awareness is awakening from the void of unconsciousness. The blank spaces yet to be filled are (I guess) what may constitute the origins of our esoteric beliefs and philosophies. I don't have those answers, but they may lie in an ancient wisdom. However, the understanding between the contrast of darkness and light appears to be universally understood. I surmise, therefore, that this acknowledgment must be innate. If that is all that we can be certain of, and we all agree upon it, than it is certainly a good platform toward rebuilding our world from its present chaos.