More Conjecture On The Great Plan
Believe it or not, some projects
or programs are made, built, developed, or conceived so that they can
be easily dismantled when their usefulness is no longer needed.
These inlaid components of deconstruction equate to much prior
planning, and serve a future purpose. Recycling serves such a
purpose. Certain materials are intentionally used in some products
that will serve a present purpose, only to be used again in the same
way or in a different application. Strategically, some bridges and
overpasses may be built in a manner so that they can easily be
destroyed by planned demolitions (explosives), so these routes cannot
be used by advancing military invaders. Likewise, even a mission can
contain numerous contingencies, should elements of that plan be
aborted in order for smooth transition when things go wrong. Think of
it as a Plan B. If there is a Great Plan that is guided by an
Illuminati, or some other form of cabal, then it would stand to
reason that any and all contingencies would have been accounted for
within their intricate and ancient scheme. What would they add into
such a mix, so as to transcend smoothly, and to account for any and
all obstacles or resistance? I've already described how the true
Order can own both sides of any equation, as I set forth in Revealing
The Great Plan, but what's contained within that aggregate slab?
If the Great Plan works the way I have theorized, there would have
been a 'latent virus' injected into every tentacle of the their all
encompassing Kraken, or every strand of their spider's networking web
that the Order might construct. I've only slightly touched on this
likely scenario within The Plan, as it may exist within the media and
the entertainment world. To fully understand this element, and so
that I don't have to rehash the entire past article (Revealing The
Great Plan), I would encourage digesting it before reading
further. Essentially, if The Plan does indeed encompass both
Darkness and Light, all facets would be set into motion by the
same hand to accomplish a larger purpose. That purpose is their
endgame, their long awaited Kingdom Come. First, lets make
sense of Hollywood, the jewel of the entertainment world.
Hollywood Babylon
In
the Statler Brothers' song, Movies,
there is a prophetic lyric: “The movies are great medicine, thank
you Thomas Edison for giving us the best years of our lives.”
Indeed, Hollywood has delivered their payload of enjoyment to our
unsuspecting lives. Perhaps a bit more than we actually realize.
Though, I wouldn't set forth to say that Hollywood was solely
established as a platform for the New World Order, I have no doubt
that they were salivating at the prospects of opportunity to
manipulate Sin City's ability to enchant the goyim psyche. It
was certainly an economical way to reach an all too eager populace
into escapism, and the wonderment (and influence) of celebrity and
stardom. Even as far back as the Romans, they understood that forms
of entertainment helped the social fabric of their empire, and thus
the many amphitheaters and coliseums, which exist today in other more
modern forms. An idle mind is the the devil's workshop, so
entertainment is a win/win for citizenry and government.
Entertainment has the ability to uplift a sometimes mundane
existence, because it occupies our minds, and it allows for fantasy.
It also can help push ideas and agendas by cleverly interweaving
messages put forth in a creative, agreeable manor, which is so
typical of influencing one's behavior or thoughts. Hollywood, like a
big yellow bug-light, attracted the mob, swindlers, hustlers,
dreamers, artists, amusement seekers, and outcasts who sought fame,
fortune, and exploitation. Just as a smelly turd attracts flies, so
too were scoundrels drawn to Hollywood. Yet, even though Hollywood
was perhaps always a cesspool for pure evil, when the coterie behind
The Great Plan interjects themselves within any scene, the forces of
both good and evil roll in on the same coin. And, as I have
speculated many times, this machine is not conscious of all
its moving parts, save for the entity or entities that have their
proverbial hand on the throttle. In our lifetimes, the evil element
of the true Order has been in the dominant role to serve its purpose,
both in Hollywood and through many other means. However, if you are
paying attention during a Hollywood production, you will often see
many truths underlying the larger action of their scripts. These
truths are like implanted 'viruses' that serve an obscure purpose.
There are good things that flow through the script's plot that seem
to miss the eye of the evil schemers that would edit them. They may
even deem these 'inoculations' as harmless, since their larger
malignant messages are so much more visible. However, like a tiny
sparkling diamond in a pile of dark dung, goodness resonates. It's
positive presence is always far more profound against the backdrop of
negative propaganda or deceit.
Take the movie, The
Watchmen, for instance. This one is rich with the subtle good
and elaborate evil of Hollywood manipulation. The evil in this movie
contains a much intended bias or dark tone throughout the film, while
often those elements of goodness or humanity assume minor roles to
the film's smatterings of negative propaganda. In The Watchmen,
all the villains were initially established at the onset of the
movie. The story is set during the Nixon administration, and by the
movie's end they are naturally ragging on an up and coming future
candidate, Ronald Reagan. Liberal Hollywood has always slung mud at
conservatives because of Nixon's Watergate scandal, yet even that
debacle barely makes a blip on the radar screen, to the decades of
liberal scandals yet to be officially uncovered. Lee Iaccoca and
others are portrayed as greedy (conservative) industrialists, but the
movie's intended hero (named Adrian Veidt, aka Ozymandias) is a
pacifist genius, Bruce Wayne-type of guy, who has a diabolical
solution to end world conflict that is all too familiar among
socialist and Marxist camps. This solution is to fabricate a
boogie-man for the world to unite against. Never mind that Veidt's
solution is a staged hoax that will kill millions, which is what he
deems necessary to promote lasting peace. But that's okay with him,
the population are goy (sheep), and Veidt (an elitist) knows what is
best for them. This perceived visionary, was only one of many comic
book superheros that were in the movie, but he is presented as an
'evolved being' due to his genius. Libs in Hollywood, even have Dr.
Manhattan (often portrayed as a god) concede to the genius of Adrian
Veidt (a man in a super suit) once he successfully executes his
insane plot. Hollywood also hints that Veidt is conspicuously gay,
through stereotypical visual cues, without risking his 'manly'
superpowers of brilliance, speed, agility, and power. Viedt was a
man driven by his cause, with no apparent interest in women, who was
steeped in development, technology, art, history, style, expensive
tastes, and impeccable grooming. Virtue signaling knows no bounds in
Hollywood.
On the flip-side of
this dark narrative, we were able to find compassion for even the
most despicable of the film's superheros (the Comedian), appreciate
the morality of a twisted mind like Rorschach, and understand that
wonderful people can emerge from even the most dysfunctional of
unions (Laurie Jupiter), as pointed out by Dr. Manhattan during he
and Laurie's private conversation on Mars. So, there was a lot good
going on for the viewing movie goer to absorb during this film that
had to be present to move the script along. However, the one-sided
political and social agendas were constantly hammering away at our
psyche during the entire experience. I easily detect these
manipulative techniques, but for many others who don't recognize
them, notions are still implanted into the mind to be dealt with
subliminally, and persuasive techniques are employed that may alter,
embolden, ignite, or reinforce ones perspective. For those who
recognize the manipulation, it is an entirely different experience.
It is one of acknowledging the less obvious, and then analyzing it. I
am not too uncertain that these revelations weren't intended to be
found, because identifying these 'crumbs' open other dimensions of
awareness.
Another such movie was
Hero. Though the message was making a case for 'One China',
it might as well have been promoting (in the negative sense) a 'New
World Order'. In short, the movie's main character was a hero
because he had the greatest opportunity and skill to accomplish the
assassination of what would become the first unifying leader of
China, from a land mass of several independent warring states. This
hero's journey was interesting, and much more involved than I was
able to comprehend initially, due to the fact that the movie was in
Chinese, with English subtitles. It is very difficult to have to
read, and catch all the nuances of a film at the same time. However,
despite the fact that the despot wins the day, and the
would-be-assassin (the hero) allows himself to be sacrificed because
he decided it best not to kill China's future leader, the hero once
again 'evolves' in his thinking from all his previous encounters. He
even accepted his death, because after all, rules are rules, even
though he spared the would-be emperor. Spare him or not, plotting
against the conqueror was a death sentence, or so liberal Hollywood
(and Red China) would think. I ration that the viewing audience is
supposed to accept this liberal logic as fact. So, by movie's end
the hero is viewed as a martyr, a symbol of just how close the
Chinese came to having a 'diverse' China, rather than a China run by
a despot. I guess it all depends on your own political philosophy.
We were also left with a message, that only in heaven are we
truly free from tyranny (which on earth is deemed essential or
necessary). So the theme they were selling in Hollywood was that, on
earth things must be one way, and in the great beyond our spirit will
experience true freedom. How convenient? Most of these propagandist
don't even believe in an afterlife, or judgment after death. That was
my interpretation, but I've read other interpretations on the movie
Hero that seem academic. I'd have to see the film again with
a good English translation to be able to confirm my own thoughts, but
the movie certainly struck me in the manner which I described. Free
men don't like despotism, but then again, we haven't had despots that
are eternally benevolent either. History has had it's share of good
ones and bad ones. The movie message also hints that destinies (I
guess, Manifest Destiny) will be played out, and most of us are mere
pawns in the game. There are many, many more movies that have these
good/bad elements in them, and they are very much planned into these
films as every movie is an opportunity to get inside your mind, be it
for good or ill intentions. At the present, most seeds planted from
the Hollywood industry have been intended to enslave us, divide us,
and undermine faith. They are programming us socially to accept a
certain ideology.
The Evil Media
Without a doubt, we've discovered over time that our once, 'free
speaking/thinking' media, is now no better than the old Soviet rag
known as Pravda. In fact, our press is a whole hell-of-lot sneakier
than Tass, because controlling our minds through media in the US
called for owning the whole Monopoly board while appearing as many
independent media entities. Once you own the whole block you can
make the rules no matter how many houses line the street. Not only
is it true with newsprint, it is also true with television network
news and cable. We think because we have a number of choices to
choose from, that we are getting a variety of diverse newsworthy
reporting. We aren't, no matter what flavor you prefer your news to
be. The only difference is the propaganda meter. They all report
the same crap determined to be of utter most importance. The only
difference is the spin. Depending on the audience tuning in, the
Order will effectively inform and influence that segment of the
population on how to interpret the events being posted. They control
the narrative. They control the content. They control your mind.
You decide how you want to swallow your news from the spoons that
CNN, Fox, MSNBC and others provide for you. Being conservative, I
used to only be able to stomach Fox News, but now I'd rather tune in
to CRTV.com. The future for the news cycle will one day be mostly
online bloggers and websites. The distrust in all television media
and television news commentary have pushed most people to dig through
less conventional alternatives to try to interpret what is really
going on in the world.
A Shining Example
Surely,
anyone who has watched a television drama or cinematic portrayal of
cops-in-action, have seen an example of the Good Cop, Bad
Cop interrogation. This is yet
another example of how one
entity may contain a form of both benevolence and evil,
just exactly in the same way I have proposed that the true Order at
work in the world is neither a good order or a bad order, but rather
two-sides of the same coin. I have advocated that within such an
order, one hemisphere of this 'figurative body' is unaware of the
other; yet share a not-so-common brain (a genius single entity or
group).
So,
when law enforcement play their Good Cop/Bad Cop
game, both cops have the same mission. They want a confession, or at
the least, a useful lead to pursue their case. One uses kindness.
“Can I get you a soda? Would you like a cigarette? Look, I
empathize with what you were going through., etc.” The other
applies the heat. “You little son-of-a-bitch, I'll sweat you all
night... I know you killed the girl. Your own friend turned on you
this morning. You're made, so you better give me the real story or
I'll see to it that you hang for the whole deal.” So, you try a
little sweet, and if
that doesn't produce the desired result, you take the sour
approach. The single entity is the police department, and it's
single goal (which is to break down the criminal's resistance), is
accomplished via the two forces
of nice and not-so-nice.
I'm
now going to share a shining example (one of many) on how the true
Order, which encompasses both forces of good and evil to obtain their
ancient goal (The Great Plan), can disassemble what they themselves
once assembled, in order to continue their plotted course. These
examples are 'latent, built-in
viruses' that lie dormant until a time that they must 'kill-off' one
stage of their agenda to advance another. Enter William Milton
Cooper. In his own small way, he was able to advance the true
Order's business, as JFK did in a much larger scope. Both were
tragic figures, casualties of a patient agenda that progresses
through a series of actions and reactions. An equivalent to a Bill
Cooper of yesterday, might be an Assange, or a Snowden of today.
None of them had to be aware of their contribution, and likely none
of them were pushed in any direct way by the Order to do what they
did. Their qualities as human beings were simply utilized. Cooper
who wrote the tell-all book, Behold A Pale Horse
(in 1991), was a veteran of the Vietnam War. He served in two
branches of the military during his career. It was his Naval
experience that placed him in a position where he regularly saw Top
Secret materials. He was a patriot by all manner of the definition
of a patriot. He loved his country and his service, and he truly was
a decorated war hero. He cherished the Constitution and the Bill of
Rights to his own peril. I told his brief story in the article,
Revealing The Great Plan,
so I will not reiterate much of what I have already written. In his
time in service, Cooper saw classified materials on a proposed
operation of a plan called 'MindWar'. MindWar was to be a new
approach to old PsyOp techniques, which were viewed
outdated/ineffective for future wars and modern battlefields. It's
possibilities were researched initially by two US Army officers, one
of which was a junior officer at that time. While his superior
officer's name is often forgotten (see Cooper's book), the other
officer is quite well known to those who delve into conspiracy. This
bizarre individual's name is Micheal Aquino, and he has been known
for his open practice of Satanism, and activities as a Satanic Priest
(mainly within the Temple of Set). I have a theory about Aquino, and
I may get into that later. Anyway, Major (at the time of the MindWar
memo) Aquino, and his superior officer (Col. Paul E. Vallely) were
both involved in Army Intelligence, and were the ones who introduced
the perceived advantages of MindWar goals over conventional PsyOps.
A PsyOp is an accessory or 'force multiplier, which may still have
useful applications; however, the MindWar is a strategy to which
tactical warfare must conform
to achieve its maximum effectiveness. In other words, it (MindWar)
need be the main consideration before preceding into any conquest.
MindWar is not a mere element within a strategy, as is the use of how
a conventional PsyOp might be implemented. MindWar is
(or should be in their assessment) the strategy, or format of all
future battle plans. In simplest terms, I envision MindWar as a
heart-to-heart talk that appeals mainly to the average-to-superior
intellectual minds of any opposing force. Rather than attempting to
fool the intellect of an opponent with PsyOps, the perceived
pervasive force seeks to logically weaken the will
of the would-be-combatant without tricks or deception. If the
pervasive force can 'win' or even 'neutralize' the will of
the minds of any given enemy's
resistance, the impending military action can be either diverted, or
be far less devastating to life and property. It doesn't always
change an ideology, nor is that its intention, but it can lessen
the resolve of more logical
minds to take up arms and engage in battle. And lets face it, these
are the same bulk of minds that lead those who are less
intellectually adept, or who would follow ideologies blindly, or who
are more prone to falling for the old 'banana peel slap-stick' of a
conventional PsyOp. The MindWar however, is defined as 'deliberate'
and 'aggressive'. It means business. The outcome of any commitment
to conflict, can only be an all-out, overwhelming, decisive victory.
All intent is above the table. All concerns are addressed,
concessions are considered, and the resolve of the pervasive force
will be made abundantly clear.
The
MindWar memo or plan seems to have been conceived in perhaps the
1970s or early 80s, and adopts much of the old Roman mindset
concerning conquest. However, was the MindWar concept ever
implemented? Firstly, a common enemy of the MindWar had to be
confronted and defeated. This enemy would not have been fully
realized at the time of the memo I read from Cooper's book. The pair
that concieved the memo/plan, attributed our loss of the Vietnam War
to a greater PsyOp that they believed occurred as a consequence
of our own operations. We know now, through sources like Q, and past
conspiracies uncovered, that there are no consequences when media and
politics are involved. MindWar is not a lukewarm approach, it's a
shit-or-get-off -the-pot deposition.
What the MindWar memo/plan hadn't considered was that elements in
our own government, like the CIA and crooked politicians, were
subverting and limiting our efforts toward decisive victory in
Vietnam (and likely had done the same in past conflicts as well). We
now know that the CIA greatly influences the content of the news
cycle. It was the media's constant anti-war drum beat, that weakened
the will of the US
population, which eventually caved to the communists, and therefore
sacrificed Vietnam, its people, and the region (Cambodia/Laos) to
suffer by the millions to genocide, disease and cruelty. Crooked
politicians, their policies, and their interests, tied the
hands of generals and war
planners, until a weary American public had determined that a victory
in Vietnam, and the loss of our sons and daughters to a never ending
war, wasn't worth continuing. We lost not to the communists in the
end, but by the hand of our own shadow government that
was working a PsyOp of their own on the American people through,
assassinations, military-industrial-complex greed, crooked political
policy, community agitation, subversive social movements, and through
many mediums of propaganda. We sent our Dogs-of-War, into a conflict
designed to make dark money, advance dark intelligence operations,
and strengthen a shadow government that has no loyalty to any
country, but to its own goal of evil manipulation, and suffering for
the people of the world.
Somewhere
in between introducing the MindWar memo/plan, and the discovery of
these subversive entities within our own government, I believe that
the MindWar concept was not only embraced, but systematically
implemented at home and abroad, and the planned elimination of all
these 'bad actors' would be approached in carefully executed stages.
These 'bad actors' and organizations are now being dismantled, thanks
in great part to the very Order that once allowed darkness to
flourish unabated. One shinning example of the
implementation of MindWar on a media front
is INFOWARS, whose very name, I believe, was derived from the larger
aforementioned operational philosophy. The INFOWARS slogan, There's
a War On For Your Mind, is
literally (war/mind) MindWar. There are many ironies in the
connections to INFOWARS and the MindWar operation. The first bit of
irony involves Bill Cooper. Prior to INFOWARS entering the scene on
March 3, 1999, Cooper had a radio show called The Hour Of
The Time. Likewise, Alex Jones,
over time had hosted a number of venues. He had a call-in format,
public access cable TV program, that evolved into a later radio
broadcast called The Final Edition.
Since that time, there has been the introduction of INFOWARS,
NewsWars, and PrisonPlanet. At some point in the 1990's, Cooper was
invited on to one of Jone's venues. A few years later, and only
months before Cooper was gunned down, he made a scathing announcement
about Alex Jones. Jones had apparently maligned Cooper on one of his
later broadcasts, charging him of having a foul mouth and making
false claims while being a guest on his show. Cooper explained that
he was only on Jone's show once, and that the accusations were
unfounded, and that Jone's was (and I'm paraphrasing) a “...pathetic,
stinking little coward liar.”. The irony, as I see it, is that
Cooper became a victim to an element of the very program he had
witnessed in secret documents while in Naval Intelligence. A few
decades later, Cooper would not recognize that the MindWar program
had indeed been implemented, and that Jones might well have been
groomed as one of many MindWar assets. Again, Jones as well as
others, would not even have to know that they were cogs within a
larger machine. Despite the Cooper/Jones spat, INFOWARS and Alex
Jones have greatly aided the MindWar program. We know both Cooper
and Jones have been successful, because of the way the opposition has
defined these men and their activities. Wikipedia, a very biased
non-profit
organization in much the same light as the Southern Poverty Law
Center, is a favored source for many searching for quick information
online. They actually have often used the SPLC's opinions, when
defining other (mainly conservative) groups or individuals. Wikipedia
defines Cooper as a conspiracy theorist,
and here's a new term for you, he was also defined as a
militiatheoretician. Wikipedia
charges much the same of Alex Jones. He is defined as a conspiracy
theorist, and an alt-right conservative among other things. Jones'
INFOWARS is defined as fake news,
a term actually coined by the right concerning the liberal mainstream
media. We all know that the MSM takes their marching orders in-part
from the CIA and other shadow government figures. Trump pushed the
'fake news' moniker, and it has made a laughing stock of CNN and
other MSM as people are awakening due to Q postings (another MindWar
asset). So liberal outlets have been childishly repeating as
strategy, the old nursery school chant, 'I am rubber, you are glue'.
It is failing miserably. We have seen that nearly all the charges
leveled at conservatives, are exactly what liberals are guilty of
doing. Goebbels would be proud of American Liberalism. And to be
clear, I am far more in favor of the dramatic rantings of INFOWARS,
than the present liberal fake news,
be it a asset of MindWar or not.
Special Delivery
Just
as a rocket needs a few stages to project a payload into space, so
too, has the true Order used the two forces of good and evil to
propel us toward their desired destination. Though this seems to be
as plain as the nose on our faces, there is still some confusion on
where exactly this 'journey' takes us. Will we recognize the good
guys from the bad guys at our journey's end? At the present, we as
participants, have been offered only two choices or avenues toward
our destiny. That began with a choice between the devil we knew
(Hillary Clinton), and the devil we didn't know (Donald Trump). In
my humble opinion, all that Trump has done thus far seems better than
the alternative. Do we prefer MindWar with hands above the table, or
the continued antics of negative
PsyOps with hands under the table? In a way, it is like going
willfully into a World Order with one's eyes open, or entering it in
the unconscious state of blindness from which we seem to have only
recently awoken. Was this the genius of the true Order's coveted
strategy? A choice between a rock and a hard place? I can't be 100%
sure. I am certain however, that the awaited package is going to be
delivered, and there will be no option for it to be returned
to sender. We are gettin' what
were gettin'. What comes after is still anybody's guess. There's no
turning back once all the bad actors are gone. And what of the void
that will be left in its place? If Trump is real, and Q is real, my
endorsement of that destiny remains under a condition that Trump and
Q have good intentions. When MindWar succeeds against our enemies,
and our citizenry wishes to return to business-as-usual, would
returning to that option be logical? Might it invite the very
conditions that lead us astray? Will we sure-up
our Constitution in a manner as to abolish all corruption from our
hallowed halls, or will the dream of our forefather's Republic have
to be totally revamped? Perhaps we as citizenry will one day face
our own MindWar ultimatum, where concessions are considered, concerns
are addressed, and a will-bending logic will be leveled at us. Will
we accept it? Will we trust its intentions are good?
All
does actually revolve around the intent of the machine behind
MindWar, or similar operations that the true Order could be using,
because the Order seems for now to be focused on a cleanse.
It isn't the Hero of
the movie's namesake sacrificing himself to an effigy of Communist
China, nor is it like Adrian Veidt advancing his diabolic plan to
trick humanity into deeper lies in order make peace. These were
underhanded techniques, and deceptive motives with hands under the
table. What have we definitively learned about the true Order's
modus operandi? Could it be as I suspect; two sides of the same
coin? Have we not created our destiny from our own actions, provoked
in part by deception? We've made good and bad decisions. We've
sometimes caved to temptation and sin, and consequences have resulted
from our choices. Dire consequences at times, through the
manipulation of our own vices. Some have remained ridged and
righteous. But, many have submerged so deeply into evil, that only a
miracle from God could bring them back. Even our own earthly
justice, can't ignore many of these heinous acts. There's plenty of
blame to go around, but our condition collectively lies in our
multitude of poor choices that delivered us to a place where humanity
now needs intervention. We must concede that these forces (Good &
Evil) are, and likely always will, escape the grasp of our
comprehension. What we are able to comprehend however, is that light
pushes darkness aside, and that awareness is awakening from the void
of unconsciousness. The blank spaces yet to be filled are (I guess)
what may constitute the origins of our esoteric beliefs and
philosophies. I don't have those answers, but they may lie in an
ancient wisdom. However, the understanding between the contrast of
darkness and light appears to be universally understood. I surmise,
therefore, that this acknowledgment must be innate. If that is all
that we can be certain of, and we all agree upon it, than it is
certainly a good platform toward rebuilding our world from its
present chaos.
