Identity: The Fall of the Biological Female

Identity: The Fall of the Biological Female

Sixty years ago, or there about, women were encouraged to liberate. For whatever reason, women set-off to become liberated from men and tradition. The reasons of course, be they justified or not, evolved over time and erupted into a feminist revolution. Regardless of its origins, the movement became justified through various grievances, and despite one's personal view on the subject matter, resulted in legal actions to improve equality in the workplace, education, various professions, politics, business, and industry. Due to innate physical differences between men and women, many physical standards for eligible positions in various traditional vocations dominated by males, were either lowered or expelled to accommodate fairness to women. This is not to say that there are no women capable of equaling the physical accomplishments of average men, just that these cases are more the exception and not the rule. It is acknowledged that many men wash-out in the presence of the highest qualifying standards. However to grant women into these particular systems, overall standards had to become less selective. Examples of such vocations might include law enforcement, firefighters, or certain military skills/schools/training. Though these physical differences are more apparent in sex segregated sports at most collegiate, Olympic, and professional levels, women were accommodated in mostly all sports activities desired. One of many examples might be women's basketball from grade school to pro, which has allowed women to have a 'league of their own' and not compete directly with men of the same caliber.

However, as irony or karma might have it, a revolution of a far different kind has recently boiled over, and is now challenging hard fought feminist accomplishments. After decades of throwing off kitchen aprons, burning bras, protesting, and fighting for equality among males, biological men identifying as females are now challenging the achievements of liberated biological females. These FemMen (my terminology) are slowly encroaching in areas exclusive to biologically born women. These physically marginal men, who identify as women, are now dominating their female competitors in many of the women's sports and activities. Using some of the same arguments of equality launched by past feminist, gay rights advocates, and perhaps even race-based groups, how an individual might identify seems to be becoming the new equality argument. Today, transgender-ism and an organization known as NAMBLA (neither group being necessarily related to the other) are once again pushing the limits of acceptability, preference, or normalcy. The latter organization has more recently tried to attach itself to those in the LGBTQ community who may be sympathetic toward them as odd-men-out (no pun intended).

In matters of race, it has always been evident as with all mankind, that there are only male and female sexes. No amount of bigotry could ever change that. But transgenders might use their identity plight to be recognized as being similar to racism. Sexual identity plight and racial bias are not analogous. It is a very poor comparison to prop them up as equals. Among gays and lesbians, it would appear that both celebrate their sexuality, while still accepting that they are either men and/or women. While these same sex unions may not question their biological make-up, many straight and gay people may recognize feminine or masculine mannerisms/characteristics among themselves, thus terms used among them like boi, dyke, faggot, bear, pan, poly, cis, ace, bi, butch, cub, otter, tomcat, queen, and others. There may be a dominant/recessive portrayal in one or the other male or female in a same sex relationship as well as a heterosexual union. The underlying question in such unions are, “Which one of you is the guy, or which is the girl in the relationship?” Usually, it is evident, or sometimes nonexistent, but the point is there is an 'identity' with a sex opposite of one's biology. As the lines are becoming more blurred on whether it is our feelings, or our biology that will determine our sexual identity, it is self-evident that it will be biological women who will suffer the most, if FemMen, are allowed to be categorized the same as biologically born women.

The XX chromosomes create a biological female, while a XY or XYY chromosomes create a biological male. Though it is presently impossible to erase the Y or YY chromosomes inside biologically male bodies, or add the needed additional X to become female, it is political correctness and (quiet frankly) satanically evil agendas, that are determined to defy real science or nature for the sake of pseudo-equality. They are already doing this with the religion of Scientism, which lacks the essence of long defined science by eliminating the 'Scientific Method' altogether, thus becoming an opinion based in sociopolitical engineering . They have, therefore, hijacked the word 'Science' and redefined it to suit their own agendas.

In altering Science or ignoring nature, biological men and women who naturally 'identify' with their birth rite, are forced to accept or embrace the falsehood and deception of transgender-ism. Throughout my own life, I've been indifferent toward gays, lesbians, and transgenders. I didn't care who they slept with as long as they were consenting adults. Though I view their sexuality as abnormal, many people have not moved from the position of it being sinful or an abomination. It certainly seems mentally unhealthy, but despite my opinions, it's best I not judge them. I have enough on my hands dealing with my own sin. Yet, there is still the old adage, 'Give them an inch, and they'll take a mile', that might raise concern in my own life. Thus, relatively, the further you drift from normal, the more you risk accepting anything until all of it becomes abnormal. What is the cost of such a shift? There is also the saying that, 'Once the camel has his nose in the tent, he'll be hopping in bed with you'. The general consensus is that what gays do with each other sexually, has no effect on anyone else's life. So, it can seem abnormal to one, and yet not effect them. However, what is perceived as abnormal will always challenge the norm for more and more acceptance. This will be no different with transgender-ism. So, one must ask, does it effect normalcy if nature isn't applied as the standard? The once exclusive institution of marriage, which was created as a religious celebration via a ritual union before God, between a man and a woman for the purpose procreation, has in recent years been challenged and redefined. The adoption of children by homosexuals, and parenting within such unions, are now accepted as normal in most Western countries or cultures. A child can be raised by two dads or two moms, and soon perhaps also, two whatevers followed by an unending list of preferred pronouns that describe them.

With all these things being acceptable, it no longer seems far fetched that transgenders would seek out the gay community to support them. These perceived 'abnormal lifestyles' are all enemies of freedom to a Deep State (DS), to Communists, to true fascism, today's political left, to radical Muslims, or to a mysterious Illuminati. These groups hate freedom. The DS support gangs like MS 13, they fund terror, they hate homosexuals, and they loathe transgenders. These freedom-haters worst enemy is nature, normalcy and tradition. They hate nationalism and promote globalism. The DS favor Marxism/socialism over Capitalism. Freedom-haters despise God. While freedom-lovers will bend to accommodate nearly anything, freedom-haters will manipulate those accommodated, and use them as their cannon fodder. Once their division is accomplished at all levels of society, and freedom is destroyed, the vacuum will result in the gathering-up of Christians, Jews, political dissenters, opposing writers/artists and the entire LBGTQ community. In these cases, 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend', until I can defeat my enemy. At that point, the friendship (and their usefulness to them) is then reassessed. With the defeat of freedom, the freedom-hating DS no longer need the accommodated (LBGTQ). The bitter irony will have been that the LGBTQ community had gained some victories in one system, and took it to its breaking point, only to aid in the destruction of normalcy. Their ally will then devour them like a mating female spider. It is the classic Icarus Effect, playing out at its finest.

More ironic, or perhaps karmic is the resulting outcome of all this liberation for the social status of biological women. Human biological females were always weaker physically, but that is basically where the advantages of being male end. Males and females are mutually essential to the existence of the human race. Though processes may differ, there is no reason why one sex should be more intelligent than another. Male and female energy are essential. These energies have little to do with intercourse or sensuality. That rationality is for beings and wildlife that must procreate to remain in existence, because they are not immortal. Immortal beings likely possess male and female (dominate and recessive) energies regardless of matching genitalia, or are spirit bodies that possess both these crucial energies. I once saw a video of a lioness stalking a stampede of African bison. She was carefully inspecting the charging herd, to select her target while likely weighing the costs (injury) and benefits (sustenance). She was perhaps searching for a loafer, or a smaller beast on the outskirts to pick-off. But before she could commit herself, a hard charging male lion literally and randomly blasted through the flank of the stampede. Like a bowling ball crashing into a rack of pins, the lion violently collided with a random beast, as the stampede scattered to accommodate his audacious kill. Men might say while high-fiving themselves, “Now that's the way it's done!” Women may shake their heads and roll their eyes, thinking, “Here we go again with the testosterone thing.” However, these feelings are not the case with other male and female mammals, as well as other creatures in nature.

If my theory is correct, as laid out in the article entitled, MORE, humans are a facsimile of the higher entities that originally engineered them, but with two assumed major differences. Humankind's energies were split into two distinctly different beings, that reflect those energies, with reproductive sexual qualities to assure the continuance of life. Unlike the Elohim (if indeed immortal beings), mankind are mortals. Thus, the Elohim might not have been sexual beings, even though they possessed dominate and recessive energies (or direct vs. subtle energies). Regardless of the origin of these energies, be they real or a metaphor, one must not be mislead that these energies are only sexually specific. We are the one's who characterize these powers as male and female for our own understanding. Defining energies in this way, has caused some animosity between men and women over time. This was perhaps the Achilles' Heal used to create a rift between the sexes, to make one sex feel short-changed by the other. Words like dominant/recessive begin to seem termed as strong/weak when separated from one being to create (divide into) two beings. When housed in one being, the energies work together in harmony. When these energies are parsed between two distinctively different beings they can become competitive, prideful, and self-serving. This leads to feelings of disrespect, being unappreciated, or minimized. No one likes to be patronized. If these energies were in one being instead of two, it might manifest itself at times as force vs. diplomacy. If that same entity were to use one energy more often over the other, these energies would never squabble with the each other concerning equality. Yet, existing one or an other in a male being and a female being, conflict among men and women is almost a certainty. Welcome to the human condition. Logically, this condition is crucial to the survival of mortal beings, and reflects the subtle importance, and I dare say, critical significance of the female over the male in this scenario. Spartan women prided themselves by knowing their superior importance within their culture, for it was them who birthed and nurtured Spartan boys. These women were tough in their own way, embracing their form of energy. However, they were also revered by their men who sought the brutality of conquest through military dominance and might. Again, the dominant and recessive energies working together in some kind of harmony.

Though non-sexual beings (in my opinion), the Elohim likely appeared to be outwardly handsome creatures. Many who have claimed to see those in the angelic realm, especially the archangels, describe them as masculine in stature, but feminine in their beauty. Again, direct in initial male appearance and power, yet with subtle female attributes. Once more these are creatures that have no need of genitalia, breasts, or sexual intercourse, though they may possess such organs depending on how they sustain their lives (of which we know nothing), are uniquely created entities. We can only assume or theorize about these magnificent immortals. Yet, don't confuse these creatures or entities with the tits, cock & balls, goat headed, cloven-hoofed Baphomet of Luciferian lore. This is a bastardization of a slightly different subject matter that won't be covered in this article. But, I digress.

As human beings, we must sincerely appreciate both energies, and uplift the subtle one within the beings that consist of mostly female energy. This is not because it is of greater importance as a force, but because it should be rightly respected and recognized. As mentioned, the Spartans were a warrior class of people, and Spartan women were tough and proud. They embraced their femininity, as they knew that it was their energy that gave life to Spartan men and women. In nature, as with many birds, the male of the species is often larger and more colorful, while the female seems to blend more with their surroundings? Many think this is meant to distract predators from the more camouflaged female while she is nesting. Perhaps such colorful and boisterous males also attract the more bland female for mating. Nature often reflects reality, at least on this earthly plane. Though I throw no stones at alternative lifestyles, they are not the reality of nature, but uniquely human constructs in rebellion with normalcy. Human beings pride themselves with free-will, and the freedom to do as they wish with their lives. We must all be respectful of one another, but we should encourage the norm. There are traces of estrogen in men, and a smidgen of testosterone in women. That should be of no surprise when realizing the possibility of our true origin. But, we are differentiated by numerous genetic factors, including the genome that determines whether we are male or female. Placing transgender men in the same realm as biological women is a slippery slope. One can identify as anything they choose, but the underlying genome that makes us the sex we are, cannot be denied. This need not bring an unnecessary burden to transgenders, who have the right to live their lives as they choose as long as it doesn't encroach upon the reality that they are born men or women and identify otherwise. I may identify as the King of England, but if I ask for someone's head, surely no sane person would hack-it-off by me ordering it done. It seems alarming that we claim that people are mentally ill or disabled, because they are determined to have bi-polar disorder, schizophrenia, PTSD or other mental or emotional maladies. Yet, somehow, one's obsession with an opposite sexual identity is determined as normal as long as society is forced to embrace it, else be seen as cruel or bias. Strange days indeed.

Evil has long sought to erect barriers between men and women, rich and poor, light races and dark races, conservatives and liberals, and so on. They need chaos and confusion among ourselves in order to manage the flock or herd. If our existence is as I theorize, we have indeed been sheep in need of a shepherd. That shepherd will either be the prince of this world, or our Savior in Heaven who said, “Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls.” For those who have not found our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, think of it as I have once coined the situation. “We as a human race are all sheep. No one that is human is exempt from that status. So, as a sheep, would you rather have a shepherd that wants you for your wool, or for your meat?” 

MORE

MORE

(Preface)

The main body of this article, which is now more the size of a book, was difficult to articulate due to its complex subject matter concerning Original Sin. One might want to read it in parts, digesting each one and contemplating it piece by piece, instead of taking it all in at one time. This is a long, long, read. I began this article sometime in March 2020, and aside from this preface, finished it for the most part on the 9^th of April 2020. I've not been in a hurry to post my work, in part because of the respect I have for an online video blogger I'll call JK. JK's bible study helped me with a crucial part of Genesis 1, that had puzzled me for decades, which seemed to confirm some of my own long held theories. JK was hinting that he would be posting something very soon that I had supposed might be very close to what I was speculating, so I eagerly awaited to see what he was going to put out. As weeks passed, it seemed as though he was waiting for the right time to release his findings as well. Later, it seemed as though, he had postponed delivering his own revelation that I thought might parallel my own theories. All these months later, I certainly share much of what JK believes to be true. In my opinion, God has clearly worked through him. My ideas are not meant to be competitive, and are definitely not intended to challenge anyone's prophetic word, faith or calling. They are merely theories based on my own understanding and advanced education in literature, along with the difficult task of contemplating my own, possibly flawed, interpretation of bible scripture. Understand that JK is trying to save souls through Jesus Christ, because he believes we are living in the End-times. He would likely then, find little interest in my own theories.

It is now February 2021. Much has happened in the world and in politics. I still periodically tune in to JK, and noted that he recently commented (for his first time) on matters concerning Q, and the Q /Anon phenomena. He clearly believes Q to be a distraction from the saving of souls. To JK, Q is a non-factor in the larger scheme of things. He said that Q is nothing but a PsyOp, designed to ferret-out or expose the deep state's enemies. In some ways, I agree with him. I also believe that Q is not particularly a factor when it comes to saving souls. One doesn't have to follow Q drops to be saved in the blood of Jesus Christ. I also believe Q to be a distraction of sorts, but in a far different scope than what JK rations it to be. Most interestingly, I agree also that Q is a PsyOp, though not in the same light as JK. Our enemies of God don't fear those attaching their attentions to a movement, be it that of Trump or Q. Our enemies fear Christians, and we are fairly easy to pick out of the crowd. They don't have to use Q as a PsyOp to identify we Christians. However, the point is that JK feels the Q movement serves no purpose in bringing people to Christ. I would disagree, but his mission to save souls through Jesus Christ is quite enough. Nothing more is needed, but to repent of your sins and be saved. In JK's defense, he hasn't been utilizing his time to delve into Q's crucial component as a PsyOp, but to bring people to Christ through understanding our condition of sin. He wants you focused on Christ. In my interpretation, Q has been a successful force multiplier in what I believe to be an ongoing MindWar military operation that involves the entire world. If one has truly followed Q drops through all this time, one might see that the movement has actually brought people to prayer, given hope to those who certainly believe in salvation through Jesus Christ, as well as opened the doors to those who weren't at all spiritual, to realizing that God exists. Q (which I believe to be a military intelligence group) has been instrumental in exposing despicable evils once hidden from the eyes of Christian believers and moral non-believers alike. Many people now realizing these evils, can see that there is a God, and are now seeking to know Jesus Christ. JK doesn't seem to have invested too much time into investigating Q as a force-multiplier, but as you'll come to understand through reading MORE, and contemplating the analogy of what I call the Eternal Onion, you'll realize that sometimes less is enough and more is merely a bonus. The Q force-multiplier, in my opinion, has proven to be a bonus. It would be a mistake or perhaps a gross misfortune to dismiss the greater work of JK and his incredible God-given gift, due to his personal assessment of Q. God has given him a unique gift of vision which enables him to detect and decipher, almost instantaneously, the symbolism of evil. With that, JK has quite enough on his plate, and is serving the Lord through sharing his gift. We all need to use our own discernment in understanding God's prophets and anointed ones. All these kinds of people have helped me along the way, but I cannot ignore what I feel the Lord has revealed to me as well. Somehow, I have to trust there is some sense or purpose in it, thus I ponder on scenarios and theories. So, lets dive into it, shall we?

MORE (Part 1)

Beyond the Center of the Eternal Onion

Well, doomsday is upon us, as it has always been. The end is nigh. Jesus is coming. We're going home. Judgment Day abounds. I've heard all these phrases in one form or another since my childhood. Some were tagged on fences and walls of buildings, while others were held on cardboard signs by roadside bums or hell-fire evangelists perched on steps of hallowed universities. They've even made their mark in Hollywood movies and television shows. Since the crucifixion of Christ, and even from the time of Noah, it seems the world would at some point come to a dismal end. We would know the signs but not the hour, and we were not to live our lives for the end, but dutifully carry on until the end came. Individually, our own personal doomsday is rest assured to come, hopefully after a long fruitful life. And, so too, we expect the earth will one day meet a similar destiny.

As a believer in Jesus Christ, I trust we have an opportunity to carry on beyond our earthly bodies. I have no tangible proof supporting this belief beyond my own faith. Within that faith is a belief that I was born into sin by no fault of the Holy Spirit, and because that Holy Spirit loves me, it would create a way for me to realize my transgression, pay the karmic debt, and offer me a remedy through some kind of redemption. Christians often refer to this process as being saved. The process is not complicated. In fact, it is so simple, that most who are saved are coached through it by clergy or by some other person who has already claimed to be saved.

Drifting away for just a moment from this very serious dialogue, I want to ask the reader a question. Have you ever done something you regret? Take your time and think of something in particular that you really wish with all your heart that you could undo. I'll tell you what one of mine was. I had a friend named JoAnn, that over time, I began to have feelings for. You know, love feelings. She'd hung with our group, and she'd once dated one of the guys in our circle of friends. He'd broken up with her, and she and I had grown a tiny bit closer. She, however, lived in another state and eventually found someone special. She called me to tell me about him. After all, we'd been friends for years. She and he were going to be traveling through, and she wanted me to meet him. I agreed and acted excited, but inside I was experiencing anxiety and self pity. The week she came through town, she stopped at our agreed place of meeting. I didn't show. I had made sure that a family member saw her to let her know I could not make it. I think she knew why, but I was never certain. She married that man, and some years later they divorced. She showed up at the wedding of a mutual friend some years later. I was with my fiancee at that time, and JoAnn and I spoke. She looked beautiful. After the reception she said her goodbyes to all of us and went on her way. I never saw or heard from her again. In fact, no one in our tight circle has seen hide-nor-hair of her since. She disappeared from all of us, forever. That was probably around 1997. I got married in 1999, and I too divorced my spouse in 2001, after 9-11. If I could be fortunate enough to see JoAnn one more time before I died, I would hope to tell her this:

“Jo, I was a complete bastard for not sharing in your happiness that day, when you traveled through my town, so that you might introduce me to your husband-to-be. I was feeling sorry for myself, and didn't have the courage to share your time of joy as any true friend would have done. I don't deserve to be forgiven, but I hope that somewhere in your heart you can find it to forgive me someday.”

What you wish you could hear is, “You're forgiven”, but it never really comes. Whether one has expired, or has turned away from betrayal, you realize that you are not worthy of anything from those you've wronged. So my regret remains, as well it should. Sure, I justified what I had done. I've gone through betrayals of my own. Things weren't too great in my own life at that time, and it was comforting to think that perhaps I'd be able to develop a closer relationship with JoAnn. It was my misfortune that I was either delusional, or a day late and a nickel short. However, nothing could ever excuse my abandonment of her on that day. As time goes on, you even wonder if that was a defining moment in her life. Maybe, if I'd have met the man she fell in love with, they might have still been together. What if my single act of cowardice, jinxed her relationship or perhaps her life? In these times of social media, facebook, Linkedin, tweeting and various search engines, you'd think it would be easy to find one person. But that water, and likely the bridge that was over it, are now long, long gone. If she's still living, Jo doesn't owe me the time of day. I made my bed, and I learned a very valuable lesson. I can proudly announce that I've never repeated that error again. In fact, I won't lie my head to a pillow at night until I have resolved a known wrongdoing. So what was the point of this drama of personal redemption? It's simple.

No body owes you a get-out-of-jail-free card for wronging them. You damaged that person, or you wouldn't be feeling so bad about what you did. They may or may not forgive you, but the damage is done. In fact, most people go about their lives feeling no regret for anything they might have done that hurt another person or persons. Forgiven or not, the debt remains unpaid. It is literally impossible to give back, what you have taken from someone. Like hurtful words, they cannot be unheard. However, to be saved by the blood of Jesus Christ is an entirely different matter. Being saved is a debt paid literally by the blood and suffering of Christ on the cross. It is an undeserved clean-slate for our taking, through a willing sacrifice. It is a state of not only undoing what has been done, but an erasing of the stigma that one carries for doing it. It's an act of Grace for realizing one's sinful ways. All one has to do is admit their fault with all their heart, and accept that Jesus Christ paid the price for their clemency. Your record as a sinner is then expunged. That is why they call it being, born again in the Spirit. It is a gift. Your old skin-suit is/was so irredeemable, that you have to become new again in Christ in order to be free of sin, which brings us to that age-old question. How did we fall into sin in the first place?

Getting saved is easy compared to seeking forgiveness from the people you have wronged. Yet, how humans came into sin is more complicated than you can imagine. The few theories I'll put forth on how we fell from Grace are mostly my own. I must also thank video blogger, JK for his interpretation of our condition of sin. He is much more talented, knowledgeable, and blessed with prophecy than I will ever be. However, we differ slightly on God's endgame. I think there is more, and it does not make him wrong if there was to be more, for JK has had enough shown to him by God to draw his conclusions. Perhaps I'm in denial, or holding out for a ray of hope for mankind as Noah or Lot had done. I would never wager against JK, because one might well be mocking an instrument of God. If I'm gone to Heaven tomorrow, and there is indeed no more on the earth than the damned, then I thank my brother JK for his guidance, and the Blood of Jesus Christ's Saving Grace. The following is my own interpretation from things I believe, and that I have learned throughout my own journey. It may or may not be unique, as I'm sure others have come to similar conclusions or nurtured like-ideas.

As I have personally demonstrated, we all have done regrettable things. Spiritually, the greatest sin or transgression against God (in the broadest sense) did not (in my opinion) take place in the Garden of Eden. However, I indeed believe the plan for our redemption/salvation began with Adam and Eve in Eden. Satan is ingeniously sly. He was created and gifted by God perhaps more than any other entity that has ever existed. Yet, his loathing for God was that, despite his perfection, he'd always be something less than his Creator. He was created by God and therefore, and forever, would be, an instrument of God. We are all instruments of God. Now, all the questions come to mind of the why fors and the how comes? We'll never know them all, so please don't wear yourselves down contemplating God's mind with our own limited genius. Free-will also enters the equation at the same time we are trying to swallow the pill that God is Almighty and All Knowing. More confusion. The Holy Spirit (God in the Spirit) created duality, or opposition, when he introduced light into perceived darkness. One might call it consciousness from unconsciousness. Imagine waking-up and existing from not existing. It's more difficult than you might think. It is like there was a conception, a gestation period, then possibly a slow awareness of something to come (with no foreknowledge on how to apply it), and then kaboom, you're born into existence. There is so much to think about in all things related to God. Some religions fear contemplating the subject, because in no way can you do God justice or fairness in measuring Him. Any analogy of God is something less than God, so rightfully we shy away from anything visual, for to create such an image is not only impossible, but disrespectful/sinful and by default, idolatry. Some will not say His name or write it out in their language. I've read articles that take the 'o' out of God and write it as G-d. It's frustrating. How do you talk about God and get past the danger-zone of disrespecting Him when you can't possibly describe Him with any accuracy beyond what is All Encompassing, which in itself is inconceivable for mankind? Well, you must respectively apply a disclaimer. Here's mine: Anything I may say or observe about God, the Holy Spirit, the Creator of all things cannot be left by itself as a complete definition of Him. There is always 'more' to Him, and this 'more' goes on into infinity. It (my notions) may hold truth, but can never claim completeness. My observances and ideas about God may be true, but they will always be far from conclusive. I can also be dead-wrong in my own interpretation due to my own ignorance and fallibility.

God has given us both scripture and prophets as guides to understanding His plan or intentions. It is irresponsible to promote a biblical theory unsupported by scripture, and even more dangerous to ignore the fact, that despite one's good intentions, they could be wrong and lead one astray. Recall that Satan knows scripture through and through. He quoted it to Jesus during the Temptations of Christ in the form of questions. “Does scripture not say... ?“ Satan also interpreted God's commands to Adam and Eve deceitfully, in order to tempt them into rebellion. It is also wrong to knowingly misrepresent the opinions of others. I believe in my heart that JK is right about what he is saying. He has an amazing testimony, he's a healer, and he boldly believes God has tasked him to be an End-time Harbinger. He speaks with such conviction and comes at you with so much scripture, that I feel he is doing God's Will. Could there more? Well, I always feel that there is more. Is what JK's saying enough to encourage one to be Saved in the Name, and Blood of Jesus Christ? Yes, I believe that absolutely. I trust JK with all my being. He's speaking the truth, and is displaying his gift as God instructed him to do. He's saving souls. He's making a difference. I also have learned much from Pastor Murry of Shepherd's Church, Kim Clement, and David Hovind through the years. But, is there more to learn and know? God gives us what we need, and nothing less. Sometimes we are at a place where we personally need no more. If your cup holds 8 ounces, than at 8 ounces you're full. If your cup holds 16 ounces and you have 8 ounces in it, then you may seek more. It doesn't mean that you don't have enough, or that you need to have more. You just realize that there is a capacity for more, and you might well wish to seek it. But believe me, there is a point of saturation for the minds of mere men, and when you think you have attained critical mass, know that there is still more. Thank your Lord Jesus, however, that you need not ever venture any further than Him to be saved.

To seek more, is much like playing with Matryoshka (Russian) dolls, also known as stacking-dolls. You open the one doll, and they progressively get smaller until there is only one itty-bitty-teensy-weensy doll that cannot be made to hold another. It is like layers of an onion peeling inward to the core. In God's mind, however, it may be exactly the opposite. You are at the center of this Onion of Understanding, but it is an Eternal Onion with layers reaching outward into infinity. As you come out from the center of the onion seeking knowledge, there will always be a layer of understanding beyond the layer you have come to know. And, if it were possible to peek into eternity, which is a human fantasy, you wouldn't comprehend it without understanding the procession of layers that came before it anyway. If that were possible, you might think you know the mind of God, but you'd likely find that there is still more. There is always more.

MORE (Part 2)

What was Our Sin, if not for Eating a Forbidden Apple?

And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness:

and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of

the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping

thing that creepeth upon the earth. Genesis 1:26, KJV

One of the things that has always bothered me about what the Old Testament had to say about the creation of man was an inference that we (man) were created in, “...our image.” Our is more than one, and there is only one God. So, the Bible is either wrong, or the author of Genesis 1 was confused. I don't believe this is the case, though many will claim that the Bible may be impossible to translate, or that someone could have changed things in the scriptures to deceive us. I suppose that could happen, but for reasons that would take a book in itself to explain it, I personally don't feel that this is the case. Whether you want to believe so or not, there are many times in scripture that infer that there are certain rules or limits to what God will allow. Satan's boundaries in dealing with Job are a good example. God even offered him up to Satan, “Hast thou considered my servant Job... ?” Some folks will claim that some books or scriptures were taken out of the Bible, or not included in the canon that is now at our fingertips. That is likely, but is what we have in our Holy Bible adequate enough for us to gain Salvation? Would God allow us not to have enough, or Satan to have too much? Well, as with Job, God gave Satan quite a bit of latitude. Basically, the bottom line was that God told Satan that he could not kill Job. Even with that, Satan took all he could from Job, convinced that he could break his faith in God and thus be victorious over his Creator. What unadulterated hubris.

Who were these beings that wanted to make man in their own image, after their likeness? Well, there is a lot more going on in Genesis than meets the eye in my own opinion. Firstly, the catch-all name that we see for most things supernatural in the bible is spelled out in English as G-O-D. Not so, in original scriptures, as video blogger JK and others have pointed out time and time again. There are lots of different names for angels (or what I endearingly call, the super-dudes), and the Begins All & Ends All God, who defies explanation or description. Some of these names have broad interpretations, while others don't. They are quite often completely different entities. There is a concept however, within Christianity (and perhaps Judaism) that may elude to the personages of God. In Christianity it's called the Trinity, but I seem to have a much different take on what the Trinity actually is, so I must explain the matter in the way that I have come to interpret it, so that all the rest concerning scripture, might make logical sense to both me and my readers. I talked about my theory in the article entitled, Revealing The Great Plan (March/2018). We know from canonized scripture (The Holy Bible/Old and New Testaments, and the Torah) that there must be an Angelic Realm and angelic beings. These beings existed before us, but little to nothing is known of their beginnings. We speculate that they came sometime after light appeared from darkness, but we might never know. That knowledge probably exists (concerning the Angelic Realm) far out from the core (using our onion analogy), somewhere in the infinity-zone of onion layers unbeknownst to us. Yet, we know from these holy books that these beings exist and were themselves also created. We will just never know when that occurred exactly, but it was sometime likely after, “Let their be light” and before the creation of mankind. The Book of Enoch discusses the Angelic Realm, but for what ever reasons, this information was not included in our canon. My personal view on this is that to delve too deeply into describing the Angelic Realm might encourage people toward polytheism, and therefore lose focus on the importance of one Almighty God. Like Greek gods (and other mythical god structures), the Angelic Realm has its own pecking order of characters with their own names, along with descriptions of their function or purpose. I venture to guess that the Angelic Realm could be interpreted as, and have been labeled as gods with a small letter 'g' in many cultures. None of these super-dudes are the God we think of with the big 'G', even though the one and only God with the big 'G' may also be mentioned in the same paragraph, chapter, or story as these lesser entities. In our translations of the Bible, God and Lord God seem to be one and the same, but further investigation may also render names like Elohim, Jehovah, Yahweh, and others under the blanket English translation of God. These names may actually translate differently in context (as noted in the Strong's Concordance). These entities under the blanket term God, may be either representing, or rebelling against, the will of a higher being or force. Here's an example.

If I were a General in the military, I might give an order to the Colonel of a regiment or division to carry out a certain mission. That Colonel has now been granted the authority to disseminate that higher order to his subordinate officers to carry out that specific command. That same Colonel, however, could also disobey that higher order, and lead his subordinates astray. Likewise, in the Heavens, there is a Superior Entity that may give the same authority to a subordinate being to enforce His will. This being, who was delegated this authority, is now anointed by this Superior Force to act in His/Its behalf. This Superior Force, in my own opinion, is the Holy Spirit (Holy Ghost). It, and It alone, got the ball rolling in Genesis. It/He (and from here on I'll say He) spoke light into existence with the sound of His voice. He made the firmament and placed all the stars and planets in it. He made the dry land, and gathered the waters around it that became the seas. He, too, created all that lived on the earth. Somewhere in all that, He had created the Angelic Realm as well. I also used to believe that this Holy Spirit created man, but there is now a problem with that. Not that the Holy Spirit couldn't have created man. He certainly had the authority and ability, but He likely may not have. Not initially, at least. It seems that there were some super-dudes (an order of angels/gods) that wanted to take on that initiative. This might not have been a good idea. Now before we go any further, I feel I must make something very clear in order to go on with my theory, and honestly, this is merely a theory. It goes back the whole Onion thing. For this I find it best to use an example from a movie to make a likely point. Curiously, throughout our lives, theater of all kinds, seem to be either educating us or challenging our minds to ponder complexities.

In the movie, CONTACT that starred Jodie Foster, she discovers a message from the cosmos sent by extraterrestrials through a SETI electronic telescope, that leads to a blueprint-of-sorts on how to build a craft to travel into space to meet the aliens that sent her this knowledge. The craft ends up being more of a time machine than a space craft, and she is sent into what appears to be space, through a series of worm holes. It ends up being an inter-dimensional highway that is so ancient that even the advanced beings that have been using it, know nothing of its origins. It has just always been, and we are to assume that they have learned some of its secrets well enough to travel about the stars. The meeting of Foster and the entity (who uses the appearance of her deceased father as to not overwhelm her with their true semblance) is to be a baby step toward future interactions with this advanced civilization or realm. Foster explains that she has so many questions, but the entity says that there is a process or method that must be taken, and that it is the way it has always been done. She is then finally returned and recovered from the craft which appeared as though it had never left the immediate area. The whole event took a few mere seconds, though the video footage shot from within the craft was many hours long.

It is my own belief that our Spirit God (Holy Spirit, Holy Ghost) is an all encompassing force/entity that is beyond our comprehension. This Holy Spirit created everything that we experience and then some. It would certainly have the ability, or manifest in any way it pleases. To say that the Holy Spirit is merely an Intelligent Force is an infinitely gross understatement for a believer in our Lord God, as I imagine Him. For the nonbeliever, perhaps the only way to imagine it would be as if the Holy Spirit were a galactic master mainframe computer that has always been in existence. It has always existed, just like those inter-dimensional highways or worm holes in the movie, CONTACT. And, like the being or entity that Jodie Foster conversed with, our Angelic Realm, might know only slightly more than we do of their own genesis or creation. Perhaps the Archangels among them know even more of how they came into being. The point I'm stressing here is that the Holy Spirit's handy work is all we will ever see or comprehend of the Holy Spirit. What He created down to the smallest and largest of all we will realize, and then some, was all done by Him. He created everything. He created the stuff-of-life. All any other being can do with His creation is to either glorify it, or pervert it. The Holy Spirit does all the creating, and the Angelic Realm, along with mankind, can merely oversee or manipulate that creation. The Holy Spirit is the God of the Trinity that we will least know/understand, for He is humanly impossible to conceive. He's kind of like that General we never see that sends down orders to the Colonel whom we may only recognize from photos at Division/Battalion or by a chance meeting at a post ceremony. That commander (Colonel) carries out the will of his commanding General. The authority delegated to him, when it comes down to we servicemen and women, is as if it came from the commanding General himself. If the Holy Spirit were to anoint one within His Angelic Realm, would not this entity now possess The Will of God and the powers there vested in Him? Would this entity become the manifestation of God? Could He then be God our Father? Curiously, in artistic expressions of Micheal the Archangel, these words are bestowed: Who is like God. Many believe this to have been a question. I interpret it more like a statement. Michael is God's enforcer, but even he treads lightly in matters with Satan. Not for fear of him, but for a kind of odd respect or acknowledgment (for lack of a better word). You see the Lord God has a plan. Though Satan rebelled, he was a creature created by The Holy Spirit God. I do not fear a rattlesnake, but I would be foolish not to respect its capabilities. I don't know that Micheal in particular is an anointed being of the Holy Spirit. I'm supposing he is a likely candidate, but what does it matter? I feel there is an anointed immortal entity, as tangible as you or I, in the Angelic Realm delegated to serve as God's Will in Heaven. It is a manifestation of the Holy Spirit force/entity. In my opinion this could be The Father of the Holy Trinity. This leaves only Jesus Christ as God in the flesh, to complete the Trinity, who has said:

“...I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but through me.” John 14:6 KJV

No man, why is that? The Holy Spirit is not a respecter of man, nor the entities in the Angelic Realm, and certainly not those angels who fell from His heaven. They are His creations to do with as He pleases, and He does it in His time and at His choosing. This is the God that we can barely conceive, who in my opinion anointed one of His entities in heaven (the Father). This Father is with whom Satan has his real feud. Just as Cain would do in the flesh to Abel, Satan would have killed the Father to sit in the highest throne in heaven among his kind. But the Holy Spirit's blessing of power and authority was bestowed upon the Father, just as the Father's blessing would be bestowed upon Abel's offering instead of Cain's. Cain, like his rebellious father (Satan), became enraged and murdered Abel for being God's chosen. Figuratively, Cain would be the only son of Eve and Satan. Adam and Eve were 'one flesh', as she was fashioned from Adam's rib. Bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh, or one in the same as Adam, but with Eve being the one capable of giving birth. She is literally a female, genetically-tweaked, clone of Adam. Few realize the profound impact of that. More on that matter in a while, because it is of great importance. Abel was the first son of Eve and Adam. Cain and Abel were a unique pair of twins in that they had the same mother and different fathers. Do you think God (the Holy Spirit within the Father) didn't anticipate that Cain might murder Abel? God had warned Cain when his offering was rejected, “Evil couches at your door, but you can resist it.” Even when Cain failed in resisting his resentment and killed Abel, God would not allow harm to come of him. Why, you might ask? This boils down to a mistake made in Genesis 1 by the Elohim (a broad definition that could also mean god/gods of the small 'g'), not by God the Holy Spirit (big 'G'). The Elohim (or some in their ranks) used the Lord God's stuff-of-life, to idolize themselves, making man in their vane shew. This is the evidence JK and perhaps others had discovered from the Strong's Concordance, or by the use of context and logical reasoning when analyzing Genesis 1, but there is more.

MORE (Part 3)

The Elohim's Mankind and Lord God's Adam

Unlike those who make prophetic declarations, I would never have had the confidence or certainty through holy scripture, to be rock-solid sure of the theory I am about to share with you. I admittedly struggle with scripture, but I've always had a mind for, and understanding of mechanics of literature. My education was primarily in literature. I took coursework in various religions so that I might better understand the eluding of religion as it may apply to literature, and especially the Bible's influence upon English Literature. JK's mastery of the Strong's Concordance and his God given gift of sight, and clear understanding, help confirm (at least in my own mind) what I've always suspected. That is, that there was a broader story to the Biblical account of mankind. Is my story or theory dependent upon being correct in order to be saved. Absolutely not. It's just more to consider in the scheme of things. I have said earlier in this article, God has given enough understanding in scripture in order to be saved. In my opinion, this was perhaps the greatest purpose of having a New Testament to lead man's development onward. Consider all the rest of what I put forward as additional speculation on the true origin of our sin. And on my own account, this is nothing endorsed as a possibility by anyone other than myself. It is either based in scripture somehow or it isn't, and if there is no scripture that can back up this theory, than it can only remain a theory unsupported by any canonized scriptural evidence. However, JK seems to have at least found scripture to support two very distinct versions of mankind's appearance on the earth, and the reason for creating Adam. Therefore, I will tell you in my own words how I've interpreted what JK discovered (and what I have reckoned) concerning the two very distinct versions of mankind's appearance upon the earth.

In retrospect, the Elohim version of mankind that we see in Genesis 1, was a meddling of the Holy Spirit's stuff-of-life. This stuff-of-life, in my mind, would be akin to something like DNA. It would be the building-blocks of life. The Elohim were, for what ever reason, studying all the life in the Holy Spirit God's creation. This Holy Spirit God had created most His living creatures to be able to replicate themselves within their life cycles, and thus created both a male and a female separately to accomplish that goal. Why He made all these various living creations is far beyond our ability to ascertain. We'll likely never know, but the Elohim were of course amazed by all that the Holy Spirit God had created. For reasons of their own, be it curiosity or some other motivation (like dominion over the earth and its creatures), the Elohim went to work seeking the secrets of the living flesh. Who or what pushed the curiosity motivating the Elohim was likely Lucifer (Satan). There are some that believe there were several rebellions in heaven. The Hindu religion certainly tells of wars in the heavens, describing the vehicles and gods involved in the various battles. I'm not going to delve into this likelihood, because I feel that we have been given enough in our own scriptures of general understanding that is needed to be saved from this world regardless of every unknown possible detail that delivered us to our present state. Would it be fun to know? Yes. Do we have to know it in order to be saved or move on in our own personal development? No. We have plenty to lead us in the direction God would prefer us to take. So the most important difference with making the mankind developed by the Elohim was that they made both man and woman separately, as were the male and female creatures of the earth. I often wonder if these 'man-ape' archaeological finds were Elohim prototypes of mankind, but that might be over speculating. Whatever the case may be, they finally succeeded in some kind of breeding program that would certainly have involved a bit of their own stuff-of-life (DNA).

These Elohim beings were likely either (I'm guessing) all male in appearance and structure, androgynous (sexually indeterminate), or possibly hermaphrodite. If these Elohim, which may be one of perhaps many creatures of the Angelic Realm, are not immortal, than they too replicate somehow. The Elohim might well have been fascinated by the Holy Spirit God's flesh creations of every kind of wildlife within two distinct and separate sexes. What if they could rule over a creation similar to themselves, who were mortal, but could replicate, in order to serve them, and help them tame the earth and rule over it? So the Elohim manipulated the stuff-of-life, and bio-engineered their own male and female version of their own kind in their likeness. Like a Frankenstein monster or even an I-Robot, they manufactured their mankind with no thought of the consequences of fooling with the Holy Spirit God's stuff-of-life. They tweaked their mankind's intelligence and longevity to keep them mentally subordinate, and the Elohim would be as gods to them. I believe that some of the Elohim saw the potential of their creation becoming a mistake, and a quarrel likely broke out among them on how their mankind were to be handled, contained, treated, and utilized. Did their new creation have a soul, and could this awareness within them have been suddenly recognized by the Elohim? What now were they to do with them? I'm speculating once more that the anointed one (by the Holy Spirit) Father God in heaven was not too happy with this possible problem, and moved quickly to address it in an ethical way. But then the unthinkable happened. Many of the Elohim found that the daughters of the mankind that they bio-engineered were beautiful, and they took any of them they chose to be their mates. Later, they even sinned upon the creatures of the earth (bestiality), breeding monstrosities from the Holy Spirit's creation through His stuff-of-life. Offspring of the Elohim's breeding with mankind may have produced the Nephilim, heroes of old, and men of renown. The Holy Spirit's creation was now in chaos, and a third of the entities (angels/Elohim) in heaven rebelled. These beings were cast down to the earth to be with their daughters of man. The bible says that these fallen ones taught mankind cosmetics, the use of roots, the making of metals and war, and other things. These gods might well have been the Titans of old Greek mythology. Prometheus, who gave fire (knowledge) to mankind, stole it from the altar of Zeus. Zeus was a head-god of the Olympians who battled the Titans and was victorious due in part to the treason committed by Prometheus (a Titan) when he switched sides. Zeus had Prometheus chained to a mountain for giving man fire (knowledge), and a buzzard ate at his liver for eternity. Was Prometheus the Greek 'Lucifer'? Again, we might never know, but it is interesting. Prometheus, like Lucifer is a hero to the Illuminati and the cabal that run much of our present world. His golden likeness stands proudly in front of Rockefeller Center.

What we have here is what is known as a predicament. Though tragic to us, some might wonder if the Holy Spirit didn't create Satan for the sole purpose of displaying His mastery and dominance over evil. Though it could appear that way for us, Satan wasn't created bad. God created everything, and deemed all his creation as good. God allows for free-will, and therefore, did not create Satan as an opposition. Satan chose his fate just as Cain had done. God doesn't compete. There is nothing God can't do, and the way He does it never ceases to amaze me. It is always effortless, sometimes instantaneous according to His will, it is brilliant beyond anyone's expectations, it is always fail-proof, and most of all, it is always righteous. He can always bring things into balance or order, but it will be His way and at a time of His choosing. It is not for us to question or test God. There is no challenge for God. In this predicament, God chose to fight fire with fire. However, as one might guess, God's fire would be far hotter and utilized with much more genius. Do you think Satan would lower himself to mate with an earthly woman bio-engineered by the Elohim? The humorous answer is a big, “Hell no!” To a creature as proud as Satan, such relations would be an abomination to himself. However, would Satan instigate a plan to entrap the subjects of the Father, to bio-engineer mankind in their own vane shew (image), so they might have sexual intercourse with the daughters of these mortal men? The sad truth is, “Yes.” Satan loathes the magnificence of God, and would delight in stirring disorder in heaven and upon the earth. The curve-ball thrown at our Father in heaven was to put the Holy Spirit God's creation in chaos. However, I'm sure that the resolution to the problem came instantaneously to the Holy Spirit and our anointed Father God.

Satan has no governor on his actions, other than knowing his limits with the infinite power of the Holy Spirit. It is this force that Satan concedes or acknowledges to exist, and he does respect its power. However, Satan believes so highly in his own genius (pride), that he thinks he can tap into this force for his own gain. The Holy Spirit grants free-will, yet knows in an instant what one reaps from the choices they'll make. The Father is united with the Holy Spirit's anointing, and therefore is more contemplative of His own actions than Satan is with reckless abandon. What might the Father have contemplated? Was it that mankind caused the rebellion in heaven? Perhaps not, some of the Elohim (when tempted) sinned of their own accord while others in their ranks clearly had not. Mankind was manufactured with the stuff-of-life that the Holy Spirit made, and all that He made was good. All that is good, glorifies the Holy Spirit God. So the Elohim learned that their intent upon the stuff-of-life was not to glorify the Holy Spirit God, but to glorify themselves in idolatry. JK's amazing insight was that these angels (the Elohim or entities) that fell from heaven became trapped (as in a snare turned upside-down) within the flesh body hosts they had bio-engineered. Therefore, JK says that we (man) possess both good, and bad within us. Part of us is turned-up, but the other part is turned-down. To get right, the side that is down, has to turn upward and become one with the upside. This is achieved by repenting, and then accepting what Jesus Christ did for us on the cross. JK's theory is both fascinating and scriptural, but to do it true justice, all should discover who he is and listen to both his ministry and personal testimony.

To bring balance and peace back to the world would be a patient yet genius resolution where all parties are given a chance at redemption, all except for Satan who chose his destiny from nearly his beginning, but as a tool of the Most High, got made a part of the Holy Spirit God's over-all plan. God's plan is always good. God created His man, Adam, even more unique than He made His wildlife, but the resolution would have to be compatible with the Elohim's version of mankind in order to bring that debauchery upward as well. Remember, the Elohim's mankind was made with the Holy Spirit's stuff-of-life (good) under less than honorable (bad) intent (idolatry, self-glorification). Both the Elohim's man and their woman were damned, not for their stuff-of-life, but for the Elohim's self-glorification, fornication, and perversion of that stuff-of-life. This all had to be corrected, and God's Adam was the key. Adam was fashioned not from the same stuff-of-life that the Elohim borrowed from the Lord God's creation, but from the dirt of the earth and formed His man as a potter would from clay. The Holy Spirit God made Adam nearly from scratch, and breathed the spirit-of-life into his nostrils, and then Adam became a living thing. Wow, already this man (Adam) is a very special man. But to go toe-to-toe with Elohim's mankind (Nephilim?), Adam must also reproduce. But the Holy Spirit God, chooses not to make a separate female creature in order that they might procreate. Adam's spouse must be of the same flesh as Adam. She must be bone of his bone, and flesh of his flesh in order to accomplish the task at hand of making all things right again. Eve is Adam with a uterus, and truly two people from one person, a dominating double-dose cast into the gene pool of mankind. People always ask, “Which came first, the chicken or the egg?” Well, now you know. Clearly, it was the chicken. There is nothing redeemable in Satan, for when he chose to loathe the Lord, he'd sealed his fate. He just hadn't realized it, because the Lord he hated had not revealed it to him, but instead absorbed Satan into His plan without missing a beat.

MORE ( Part 4)

The Lord's Breed-Out Program, and the Sacrifice that Brings Us Home

“None of you seem to understand. I'm not locked in here with you. You're locked in here with me!”

- Rorschach (from the movie THE WATCHMEN)

The Creator has a knack for taking complex problems and not only correcting them, but turning them upwards to a level of beauty and promise. In a less complex way, mankind might call this process, making lemonade from lemons. The magnitude of this undertaking is proof positive that our Lord God truly loved His creation. See John chapter 3 (all of it). That the Holy Spirit God could take the heinous error of a segment of the Elohim, driven by the deceit of Satan, and blaze a trail to salvation for all who were effected or duped, is a mastery of divine genius. The beneficiaries of such a plan would be the deceived, entrapped angels in their flesh-body-hosts, souls of the living and dead throughout the centuries, and the Holy Spirit God's reconfigured mankind by a breeding-out of all inherent and apparent deficient qualities. Abel had made sure that his offering to God was without blemish, and by not keeping this prize for himself, gave it as a gift (ironically, a blood offering) to the Lord. Our Lord God was going to offer an opportunity of redemption to be available to all mankind, be it of the line of the Elohim's finagling (bad) with the stuff-of-life (good), or of Adam who was fashioned by our Lord God's mighty hands and given life from His own breath. So, Cain then kills Abel. Not a good start, but in Cain's veins also flowed Adam's blood through the flesh-of-his-flesh, Eve. That was God's genius in fashioning Eve from Adams rib and not separately. God's own breath (Spirit) was in them.

You see, the Presence of God was not locked-up with the seed of Satan. The seed of Satan had become locked-up with the Presence of God.

This was accomplished by Satan's fatal error committed in Eden, when Satan dared to enter God's garden, and dared to corrupt God's special man Adam. As the song goes, “You don't pull off Superman's cape. You don't spit into the wind. You don't pull the mask of the ol' Lone Ranger, and you don't mess around with Slim.” Eve seemed an irresistible trophy, to corrupt her would be a victory over God. Satan took his chance to go for all the gravy, and instead, got gravy all over himself. He transgressed upon the Holy Spirit God, or that entity which was anointed by Him, which is where the buck stops. One is allowed free-will, but it will never negate the Will of the Most High. Lie if you will about anything, accept for a command made from God. God schemed a scenario, and Satan, of his own accord, came into it. Satan crossed the line of no return. There are rules or conditions to a force, and Satan was well aware of them. The Serpent (Satan) was the first to be cursed. God figuratively pulled the legs out from under him. It was a death sentence, delayed. He didn't destroy him; not at that time at least. Satan was and always would be a tool of God, despite his willful loathing of the Father in heaven. Satan would provide a purpose with characters like Job, Moses, and Jesus Christ. God's scheme of repair and redemption was now in the works and Satan would play his part. His pride before him, Satan had now become self-entangled in God's plan for mankind.

The Lord God gives us the vital stats of the lineages of Adam/Eve through Cain and Seth. In the meantime the lifespan of mankind is taken down in years from the long life of Methuselah to God's preferred time span of 120 years. In scientific experiments, we use rats as test samples because we can see how things work over many generations in a relatively short amount of time. In God's plan, the shorting of days of man equates to a more docile, and controlled flock. With this, God further corrects and perfects the careless and selfish intent bred into the life-form of mankind by those of the Elohim that transgressed. He masterfully controls Satan through his son Cain's entangled blood of Adam (Eve is flesh of Adam's flesh). The trap setter (Satan), had become a reluctant victim of his own deceitful ploy, and the genius of our Lord God. Any of Adam's line who would now take on wives inside or outside of Adam's lineage, would breed improvement into the stock of the Elohim's line. They would be brought upward, eventually breeding-out their abominations (the Nephilim?). By the time of Noah, many in all walks of mankind were improved within their DNA or stuff-of-life, and in the spirit, but this was the initial phase. The Great Flood proved to be a cleansing to rid of many monstrosities as well as much of the flawed human stock, and allow the bloodline of Noah to dominate the landscape of the post flood era. These improved stock are the mankind of all race, color, and creed of today.

So what can we summarize has been accomplished up to this point? Well, a segment of the Elohim make a fatal error in messing with the Holy Spirit God's stuff-of-life. Satan/Azazel/Lucifer, a prideful angel of a higher order, willfully comes to loathe the Lord God, and deceives the Elohim to create a man and a breeder (a woman) in their image/likeness (idolatry and self gratification). These Elohim had marveled over the Lord God's (Holy Spirit God's) creation, which renewed itself for whatever purpose God had intended for them through the act of procreation. Why procreation through sexual intercourse? Again, we might never know, but God knows, I can rest assure you that. Moving on, the Elohim involved choose to do the will of Satan, and their essence or physical manifestation becomes trapped within the flesh-body-hosts they manufactured. Satan is eventually cast down with the rebellious ones of the Elohim, as one by one they are ensnared by their desire for the daughters of mankind that they engineered. These daughters of mankind were taken as lustful sex-objects and used to mother their Nephilim, some of which would go on to literally devour the creation of God. They would defile all creatures of the earth and devour them toward extinction. They would pervert the act of procreation. The Holy Spirit God, of course, knows what is going on, and implements his correction as the sowers begin to reap the effects of their deeds. God is never out of control of anything. The angels can steer themselves wrongly, just as we do in our own poor choices, but God knows all the ends of all the paths we or the angels might choose. And through the laws of the cosmos which He created, everything is judged, sentenced, and/or appeased. God's remedy is immediate though perhaps not apparent to us. The fix seems long and laborious to us as spectators awaiting redemption and/or judgment. But, does one have somewhere else they need to be? Do you have so many things to do, that you are not concerned about your own redemption? If so, you are as arrogant as the father you have chosen to serve, and that is the father-of-lies. We are God's things, and He does what He will with us. It was God's stuff-of-life that the Elohim manipulated, perverted, and defiled. It was their action that was directed through deceit by a higher being who chose to loathe God, because he wanted that anointed rank to act as the Holy Spirit God. The Lord God's remedy would be centuries in its implementation, and it began with a better mankind in God's garden. In Eden, He would begin His mission to (1) save His world, (2) save His entrapped angels within flesh host bodies, and (3) rescue His stuff-of-life, which had been misused in the Elohim's mankind. God wanted it all back. Why? Because it all belongs to Him. JK points out in Ephesians 5:14 that the bible scripture says, “Wake up, O sleeper...”. I take it that these Elohim or angels entrapped in human flesh, had long forgotten their origin. They no longer knew the glorious creatures they had been. Daft by years of imprisonment, they had become blind and deaf by their condition, but the Lord God was already implementing a fix by the use of the Word, if and only if, they would choose to embrace it. We had survived the flood. We had survived slavery in Egypt. We had endured 40 years in the wilderness. We were then delivered to a Promised Land. We would be given a method of worship, directions for cleanliness, moral commandments and civil law. God opened every avenue to improve the flesh, and prepare it for its greatest challenge of all through the Gospel (the Word). This would be accomplished through the sacrifice of the Lord God's only begotten (born) Son, to make right the transgression of those Elohim that had fallen. It was the paying of the piper, that would put the universe back into sync.

In one fell swoop, the Blood of Jesus Christ became the debt paid to rescue the Lord God's creation (the world), to awaken the old sleeper(s) entrapped genetically in flesh-body-hosts, and to save the souls of all mankind upon the earth. This was God's remedy. We have the opportunity for eternal life, by repenting of our transgressions, for full redemption by the Grace of God through our Lord Jesus Christ. It's a gift for the taking, paid for in Christ's sacrifice. All we have to do is confess it through our acknowledgment, repent, and embrace His gift. Christ took the sin of the world upon Himself to reap a harvest of repentant souls through a pathway of redemption created by our Father in Heaven. Take the gift. His yoke is easy. We've been told that we can only come to the Father through Jesus Christ (the Son). I might never be certain of my entire theory, but I am certain of much of this last paragraph as I have written it. Is knowing this enough to be Saved? I say, yes. Must one know more? I say, no, not necessarily. God said to Job, “Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? Declare, if thou hast understanding.” (Job 38:4, KJV) Job had no idea, and we don't know either. Perhaps my theory has no supporting scripture, or perhaps it is little more than a fantasy or myth. Perhaps it is a figment of my own reckoning, in order to make sense of how the plurality of making man in our-own-image or our-own-likeness can be a possibility in a One God system. I've heard many fumble around with explanations about this scripture, and not one made sense to me until JK's unique gift of sight, suggested that the Elohim's mankind was intended as a trap set for angels by Satan. God has simply been correcting the mess that Satan has made, and in doing so, has been making lemonade from lemons. He even gave mankind an understanding of Himself through the life and sacrifice of his own begotten Son, Jesus. For the bulk of humanity, Jesus Christ is the far outreaching layer of enlightenment of the Eternal Onion, that our minds can grasp as the embodiment of God through coming to understand the Gospels. The Lord God left us the bread crumbs to follow to obtain our salvation, but it must be our effort or our will to commit ourselves on that path that saves us.

MORE (Part 5)

What's Coming at Us, Total Destruction or a 1,000 years of Peace?

For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but

that the world through Him might be saved. (John 3:17 KJV)

“I may not know exactly what it is, but I damn sure know what it isn't.” I say this about a lot of things of which I'm not certain. It's a gut feeling that I think a lot of people get in their subconscious from all the subtle things that don't seem to add-up about a given situation. Years ago, when I was a paratrooper in the Persian Gulf War, my squad and I were moving through a small pass between two rocky outcroppings in Southern Iraq. It would have been the easiest way to go through this area, but something didn't feel right about it. Hummers were 'light-skinned' vehicles back then. They were not armor plated or modified, other than to carry (in our particular case) a TOW missile system or a 50 caliber machine gun. I had our driver stop the Humvee. I dismounted the vehicle and cautiously approached the small passageway. At closer inspection through my binos I could clearly see a pattern on the ground where drifting sand had settled against small prongs coming up from the ground. It was a minefield of what we called, toe-poppers. They were antipersonnel mines capable of killing or maiming anyone unfortunate enough to step on them. They would certainly have been able to disable our Humvee, and there would likely have been injury or death to those in my squad had we rolled through it. In retrospect, I often wondered what made me question that particular passageway, and why I was more critical of it as opposed to other routes we had taken. Several things came to mind. It was a new area of operation. It was also a bit of a bottle neck that we could not see beyond due to the higher rocky outcroppings. These things alone, are good enough reasons to perhaps dismount and take a look around and peer over the high ground to inspect what might be going on that was out of our field-of-view. Sometimes your training just kicks in, and you wrongfully attribute your reactions to instinct or the paranormal. I don't know for sure what tipped me off, but I knew that we weren't out for a joy-ride. I knew that we weren't in Iraq for vacation. I knew we weren't thinking that we might not engage the enemy. So, in reality, I was doing what I had been assigned to do, and that was to look after my men and myself during two operations (Desert Shield & Desert Storm). I was doing what I was trained to do as an newly promoted NCO. Caution was naturally an underlying concern in all that we did.

Our daily lives and spiritual lives are no different. There are still minefields to watch out for in our everyday lives. It is easier to recognize what some things aren't at times, than to see what they truly are. This is my struggle with bible scripture, which has been assumed or believed to be inspired by the Holy Spirit, yet penned by man. Did the author interpret God correctly? Did he have command of his own language? Did he relate a topic through a metaphor? Was it a historical account or a fictional account? Was this knowledge an oral tradition long before it was written down? Were there traditions or customs foreign to the translators of these works from one language or culture to another? All these questions are problematic when deciphering the purpose of a written work. These are the unknowns or uncertainties that forever plague us concerning our ability to comprehend the intentions of an author from antiquity. Literature, however, from my own experience, is made up of commonalities. No matter what culture or language of origin, literature seems to follow some basic or overall attributes that fit the mechanics of a story, whether it is based in fact or fiction. There is a beginning, middle and end to a historical account, as well as a legend, script or tale. It is written to be memorable, though it could also be cryptic. It is intended to be understood by someone, or a group of someones. In times past, these stories were told orally. People were street smart, but mostly informally educated. Myths and tales were handed down from family, clergy, skilled orators, and local story tellers. To gather and listen to a good story teller was a form of entertainment much like going to a movie or watching a television show. My own parents had radio shows that their families would gather round to listen to as entertainment when they were young kids. In ancient times, most people did not own books, for they were expensive and hand written. Scribes were assigned to write out anything of importance from religious scripture to business dealings. It wasn't until the advent of the printing press, that ancient literature could be introduced to the world through personal ownership, or the use of public libraries. Was this an act of God to aid the process of His plan? Had this not occurred, personal ownership of scriptural material might never have reached the hands of the common man. This freedom has allowed every person to make of what they will concerning the Holy Bible and other writings that are considered sacred. And now there is the internet (a curse in some ways, and a blessing in other ways).

In times like today, with chemical, biological, nuclear, and EM-bomb warfare, it is hard to attribute any attack to a certain country, people or government. With deep state rogues embedded in all countries and governments, the common man has become victim to invisible enemies. These enemies are saboteurs, and not necessarily uniformed forces. They are not necessarily standing armies, but scattered insurgencies nipping at the public sheep who have become a fearful flock ready to comply to obtain normalcy. They are willing to live on their knees in order to exist. They are willing to lose freedoms in order to be masters of their own prison cells. As years pass, this way of life becomes the new normal. The fake news is already trying to promote this, though I think and hope that they fail miserably. As the tables seem to be turning on evil, it is apparent only perhaps by those who embrace certain conspiracy theories, that the deep state is losing their grip. They are willing to set the world on fire, a scorched earth policy, in order to keep their boot at our collective necks. Some are already giving in by being consumed in fear and tuning into a media that has proven time and time again, that they can't be trusted to broadcast truth, but instead, only propaganda.

With literature, as well as scripture, whatever happens to us will manifest in one way or the other. It will be literal, as happening exactly as stated in every detail, or it will occur figuratively. Either way, it will come to pass as prophetic. JK says that the end is coming and I believe him. An end of business as usual is certainly coming. If it is coming in total destruction by fire, than I'm extra glad that I have repented of my sins and embraced the Lord Jesus, and acknowledge the debt He paid for me (and all of us) on the cross. Yet, call me crazy, or in denial, but as long as I have breath in my lungs, I feel that a remnant of mankind, and the world, can survive most anything if it is God's will to be so. The less-quoted John 3:17 clearly indicates God's love for the world. And though Genesis 9:15 states only that God would never destroy all life again with a flood, I find it difficult that God would ration that He may use another way to destroy all life again by other means. Note I say, “All life.” We may witness much death and destruction as Satan and his demons writhe in their death throes. Expect every dirty, underhanded trick, and deception to be used in their desperate attempt to keep control over mankind and the earth. Our bodies will still die and turn to dust one day. God will decide the fate of His creation and perhaps gather up the last of His souls, and recycle the rest of it. If that is God's Will and Word, than rest assure that time will come. Some claim that a Thousand Years of Peace are at hand. That would be fantastic. I'd spend the rest of my short life fishing and being out in God's nature. I've already surrendered my soul over to our Lord Jesus Christ. If nothing else, that's all a person needs to do in these wicked times. It is enough and no more is needed. Any positive thing that happens while I'm still living is a mere bonus. It's our duty to be vigilant toward evil, no matter the cost. Don't cave to evil. Don't bow to limitations as an exchange for peace and calm. Don't fall for their bio-engineered crises designed toward compliance. Fight to the death, be you free, exiled, or incarcerated. Just don't allow evil the fear that sustains them. Be brave. If Christ be with you, who can be against you?

MORE

(Afterward)

I've mentioned several influences who have brought me to Christ. I'm an imperfect person. I'm a sinner. Throughout my life, I've sought wisdom from many sources. I was raised Methodist, but I searched for truth from many disciplines. I took coursework in the religions/philosophies of the Far East, Hinduism, and the mythologies of Greece, Rome, and Norse culture. I've participated in Native American sweat lodges, and various other Indian rituals. I've studied various methods of healing and fighting using (Ki/Chi) breath and energy, both as a student and teacher in the martial arts. Though nearly all of these disciplines held many similarities, I've found the most comfort and blessings in the teachings of Jesus Christ. I believe it will be our generation that will physically witness the End-times. However, I am one that believes that End-times could be broadly interpreted. I've said in many of my previous articles, that I'm certain we won't be going back to business as usual. The world is awakening. There is either a new world on the horizon, or as many might believe, the destruction of this present world. Either way, the End-time of one or the other is evident.

I have great respect for video blogger JK. The reason I didn't feel it was right to reveal his name was because to do so, might make it seem that he would be in agreement with all my theories. It is likely that he would not support (any or all) my theories, and to use his good name in my article might nurture that perception. I believe God speaks to JK, just as I believe He spoke to Kim Clement, and many others I could mention. I mention JK, or refer to him a lot in this article, because it was one of his videos that opened my eyes on the creation of mankind in Genesis l. This and JK's incredible ability to interpret demonic symbolism, greatly influenced the theories within this article. Unlike JK, I do not have a ministry. My ideas are theories. They are hypotheses, not laws, or decrees. I could be wrong, and I do not profess that my theories are without flaw. I do however, feel moved to put these theories out there. Perhaps some truths will emerge. 

Q: The Coming Storm

 

I'd like to squeeze in just one more tiny article before January 20, and the supposed inauguration of a man who actually should be facing a firing squad (along with many others). Most the time, I'll write only a few articles a year, or at best months apart from one another. I would just like to leave my readers with a bit of hope in such a pivotal time in our history. It doesn't seem like there is much hope, but I assure you that there is an abundance of hope. Over the past few years, we have watched our duly elected president go through a gauntlet of relentless accusations, lies, unfounded investigations, and treachery from democrats and a smattering of republicans. More recently, we've seen the tiresome, but always effective antics of the left (through Antifa/BLM), play-out in tragedy only to be blamed upon our president. Of course, the mainstream media is not going to suspect that agent provocateurs would be dressing as Trump rally attendees, despite all the hundreds of cell phone video cameras that watched Antifa being bused in by what appeared to be a State Police escort. There is no shortage of cell phone photos and videos from nearly a quarter million (some say more) Trump supporters who reported scaffolds in places of no construction, pallets of brick/rock in various locations, and even propane tanks that were intended for ill use.

There is also footage of DC police directing crowds and moving barriers. Strange, but under-reported. How could any of what happened during the '2020 Summer of Love' in various states doing nothing about unruly protests and violent riots, with all their deaths, countless injuries, burning, and destruction of personal properties, be 'overshadowed' by the acts of a few questionable Trump supporters on January 6, 2021 in DC? I'm personally sickened by the obvious attempts at turning this self-evident, deep state circus, into being Trump's problem. Q has helped us all open our eyes to what should have always been clear. Some of us knew, but most of us were asleep. Now we can see. We can not pretend to forget all that we know now. We are no longer blinded by the shenanigans. The media has become like an old, predictable Vaudeville act, or the old banana peel trick. The media have no credibility. They now sound like a broken record, regurgitating propaganda, in the same worn-out way. They have no originality. Their talking points don't contain the level of confidence and certainty of trust that we once placed upon mainstream reporting. We immediately see where they want our minds to be taken. As their ratings tank, the majority of us don't waste our time digesting their 'programming'. We are awake. We see a nearly impossible road to justice. We see at nearly every level of authority, a hopeless infiltration of globalists and cabal. I would say that it is time to look back at Q's statements that are still hanging in the air, and likely manifesting. Q said back some time ago that, “The House would fall...”. Is that the House of Representatives? Q talked a lot about the importance of the 'the Wall' and that it was more important that we know. Invasion? Q said that we must first reach 'the precipice' of disaster before we change. Well, it seems that is now eminent. Q has said many other things that are yet to come to pass. More importantly, Q has pointed out that 'the end is not for everybody', and that 'nothing can stop what's going to happen'. He's said that, 'it will be biblical...'.

Wow! Whatever is coming, I feel it in my very soul. It is resonating in my bones. I don't know what's going to happen between now and the 20^th or beyond. I just have this enormous faith that evil is about to get a huge dose of kick-ass. I don't know when or how, but I'm not worried. I have no fear whatsoever. I'm vigilant, but I'm also at total peace. Trump keeps saying over and over again, that 'the best is yet to come.' Q has told us the words President Trump will use to signal to all of his supporters when shit is about to hit the fan. This confirmation will be said like this, and I paraphrase, “My fellow Americans, the storm is now upon us.” At this time, communications may be limited or go dark, as whatever is to occur takes place. I leave you with a bit of wisdom I found appropriate from my favorite poet/philosopher M.R. Behr. It seems we could be symbolically entering this realm:   The Harvest

Ink is in the water.

Bring the heat, feel the boil.

Freedom for the water,

as dark gathers-up to oil.

Ink was in the water,

caught entangled in its lust.

Steam rises like a harvest,

as the ink burns into dust.

Ink got in the water,

as do tares among the wheat.

Reap the useful up to heaven,

leave the rot upon the street.

Ink got in the water,

in nations, souls, and man.

Separate the grain from darnel,

then set fire to the land.

                                                                          M. R. Behr