Identity: The Fall of the Biological Female
Sixty years ago, or there about, women were encouraged to liberate. For whatever reason, women set-off to become liberated from men and tradition. The reasons of course, be they justified or not, evolved over time and erupted into a feminist revolution. Regardless of its origins, the movement became justified through various grievances, and despite one's personal view on the subject matter, resulted in legal actions to improve equality in the workplace, education, various professions, politics, business, and industry. Due to innate physical differences between men and women, many physical standards for eligible positions in various traditional vocations dominated by males, were either lowered or expelled to accommodate fairness to women. This is not to say that there are no women capable of equaling the physical accomplishments of average men, just that these cases are more the exception and not the rule. It is acknowledged that many men wash-out in the presence of the highest qualifying standards. However to grant women into these particular systems, overall standards had to become less selective. Examples of such vocations might include law enforcement, firefighters, or certain military skills/schools/training. Though these physical differences are more apparent in sex segregated sports at most collegiate, Olympic, and professional levels, women were accommodated in mostly all sports activities desired. One of many examples might be women's basketball from grade school to pro, which has allowed women to have a 'league of their own' and not compete directly with men of the same caliber.
However, as irony or karma might have it, a revolution of a far different kind has recently boiled over, and is now challenging hard fought feminist accomplishments. After decades of throwing off kitchen aprons, burning bras, protesting, and fighting for equality among males, biological men identifying as females are now challenging the achievements of liberated biological females. These FemMen (my terminology) are slowly encroaching in areas exclusive to biologically born women. These physically marginal men, who identify as women, are now dominating their female competitors in many of the women's sports and activities. Using some of the same arguments of equality launched by past feminist, gay rights advocates, and perhaps even race-based groups, how an individual might identify seems to be becoming the new equality argument. Today, transgender-ism and an organization known as NAMBLA (neither group being necessarily related to the other) are once again pushing the limits of acceptability, preference, or normalcy. The latter organization has more recently tried to attach itself to those in the LGBTQ community who may be sympathetic toward them as odd-men-out (no pun intended).
In matters of race, it has always been evident as with all mankind, that there are only male and female sexes. No amount of bigotry could ever change that. But transgenders might use their identity plight to be recognized as being similar to racism. Sexual identity plight and racial bias are not analogous. It is a very poor comparison to prop them up as equals. Among gays and lesbians, it would appear that both celebrate their sexuality, while still accepting that they are either men and/or women. While these same sex unions may not question their biological make-up, many straight and gay people may recognize feminine or masculine mannerisms/characteristics among themselves, thus terms used among them like boi, dyke, faggot, bear, pan, poly, cis, ace, bi, butch, cub, otter, tomcat, queen, and others. There may be a dominant/recessive portrayal in one or the other male or female in a same sex relationship as well as a heterosexual union. The underlying question in such unions are, “Which one of you is the guy, or which is the girl in the relationship?” Usually, it is evident, or sometimes nonexistent, but the point is there is an 'identity' with a sex opposite of one's biology. As the lines are becoming more blurred on whether it is our feelings, or our biology that will determine our sexual identity, it is self-evident that it will be biological women who will suffer the most, if FemMen, are allowed to be categorized the same as biologically born women.
The XX chromosomes create a biological female, while a XY or XYY chromosomes create a biological male. Though it is presently impossible to erase the Y or YY chromosomes inside biologically male bodies, or add the needed additional X to become female, it is political correctness and (quiet frankly) satanically evil agendas, that are determined to defy real science or nature for the sake of pseudo-equality. They are already doing this with the religion of Scientism, which lacks the essence of long defined science by eliminating the 'Scientific Method' altogether, thus becoming an opinion based in sociopolitical engineering . They have, therefore, hijacked the word 'Science' and redefined it to suit their own agendas.
In altering Science or ignoring nature, biological men and women who naturally 'identify' with their birth rite, are forced to accept or embrace the falsehood and deception of transgender-ism. Throughout my own life, I've been indifferent toward gays, lesbians, and transgenders. I didn't care who they slept with as long as they were consenting adults. Though I view their sexuality as abnormal, many people have not moved from the position of it being sinful or an abomination. It certainly seems mentally unhealthy, but despite my opinions, it's best I not judge them. I have enough on my hands dealing with my own sin. Yet, there is still the old adage, 'Give them an inch, and they'll take a mile', that might raise concern in my own life. Thus, relatively, the further you drift from normal, the more you risk accepting anything until all of it becomes abnormal. What is the cost of such a shift? There is also the saying that, 'Once the camel has his nose in the tent, he'll be hopping in bed with you'. The general consensus is that what gays do with each other sexually, has no effect on anyone else's life. So, it can seem abnormal to one, and yet not effect them. However, what is perceived as abnormal will always challenge the norm for more and more acceptance. This will be no different with transgender-ism. So, one must ask, does it effect normalcy if nature isn't applied as the standard? The once exclusive institution of marriage, which was created as a religious celebration via a ritual union before God, between a man and a woman for the purpose procreation, has in recent years been challenged and redefined. The adoption of children by homosexuals, and parenting within such unions, are now accepted as normal in most Western countries or cultures. A child can be raised by two dads or two moms, and soon perhaps also, two whatevers followed by an unending list of preferred pronouns that describe them.
With all these things being acceptable, it no longer seems far fetched that transgenders would seek out the gay community to support them. These perceived 'abnormal lifestyles' are all enemies of freedom to a Deep State (DS), to Communists, to true fascism, today's political left, to radical Muslims, or to a mysterious Illuminati. These groups hate freedom. The DS support gangs like MS 13, they fund terror, they hate homosexuals, and they loathe transgenders. These freedom-haters worst enemy is nature, normalcy and tradition. They hate nationalism and promote globalism. The DS favor Marxism/socialism over Capitalism. Freedom-haters despise God. While freedom-lovers will bend to accommodate nearly anything, freedom-haters will manipulate those accommodated, and use them as their cannon fodder. Once their division is accomplished at all levels of society, and freedom is destroyed, the vacuum will result in the gathering-up of Christians, Jews, political dissenters, opposing writers/artists and the entire LBGTQ community. In these cases, 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend', until I can defeat my enemy. At that point, the friendship (and their usefulness to them) is then reassessed. With the defeat of freedom, the freedom-hating DS no longer need the accommodated (LBGTQ). The bitter irony will have been that the LGBTQ community had gained some victories in one system, and took it to its breaking point, only to aid in the destruction of normalcy. Their ally will then devour them like a mating female spider. It is the classic Icarus Effect, playing out at its finest.
More ironic, or perhaps karmic is the resulting outcome of all this liberation for the social status of biological women. Human biological females were always weaker physically, but that is basically where the advantages of being male end. Males and females are mutually essential to the existence of the human race. Though processes may differ, there is no reason why one sex should be more intelligent than another. Male and female energy are essential. These energies have little to do with intercourse or sensuality. That rationality is for beings and wildlife that must procreate to remain in existence, because they are not immortal. Immortal beings likely possess male and female (dominate and recessive) energies regardless of matching genitalia, or are spirit bodies that possess both these crucial energies. I once saw a video of a lioness stalking a stampede of African bison. She was carefully inspecting the charging herd, to select her target while likely weighing the costs (injury) and benefits (sustenance). She was perhaps searching for a loafer, or a smaller beast on the outskirts to pick-off. But before she could commit herself, a hard charging male lion literally and randomly blasted through the flank of the stampede. Like a bowling ball crashing into a rack of pins, the lion violently collided with a random beast, as the stampede scattered to accommodate his audacious kill. Men might say while high-fiving themselves, “Now that's the way it's done!” Women may shake their heads and roll their eyes, thinking, “Here we go again with the testosterone thing.” However, these feelings are not the case with other male and female mammals, as well as other creatures in nature.
If my theory is correct, as laid out in the article entitled, MORE, humans are a facsimile of the higher entities that originally engineered them, but with two assumed major differences. Humankind's energies were split into two distinctly different beings, that reflect those energies, with reproductive sexual qualities to assure the continuance of life. Unlike the Elohim (if indeed immortal beings), mankind are mortals. Thus, the Elohim might not have been sexual beings, even though they possessed dominate and recessive energies (or direct vs. subtle energies). Regardless of the origin of these energies, be they real or a metaphor, one must not be mislead that these energies are only sexually specific. We are the one's who characterize these powers as male and female for our own understanding. Defining energies in this way, has caused some animosity between men and women over time. This was perhaps the Achilles' Heal used to create a rift between the sexes, to make one sex feel short-changed by the other. Words like dominant/recessive begin to seem termed as strong/weak when separated from one being to create (divide into) two beings. When housed in one being, the energies work together in harmony. When these energies are parsed between two distinctively different beings they can become competitive, prideful, and self-serving. This leads to feelings of disrespect, being unappreciated, or minimized. No one likes to be patronized. If these energies were in one being instead of two, it might manifest itself at times as force vs. diplomacy. If that same entity were to use one energy more often over the other, these energies would never squabble with the each other concerning equality. Yet, existing one or an other in a male being and a female being, conflict among men and women is almost a certainty. Welcome to the human condition. Logically, this condition is crucial to the survival of mortal beings, and reflects the subtle importance, and I dare say, critical significance of the female over the male in this scenario. Spartan women prided themselves by knowing their superior importance within their culture, for it was them who birthed and nurtured Spartan boys. These women were tough in their own way, embracing their form of energy. However, they were also revered by their men who sought the brutality of conquest through military dominance and might. Again, the dominant and recessive energies working together in some kind of harmony.
Though non-sexual beings (in my opinion), the Elohim likely appeared to be outwardly handsome creatures. Many who have claimed to see those in the angelic realm, especially the archangels, describe them as masculine in stature, but feminine in their beauty. Again, direct in initial male appearance and power, yet with subtle female attributes. Once more these are creatures that have no need of genitalia, breasts, or sexual intercourse, though they may possess such organs depending on how they sustain their lives (of which we know nothing), are uniquely created entities. We can only assume or theorize about these magnificent immortals. Yet, don't confuse these creatures or entities with the tits, cock & balls, goat headed, cloven-hoofed Baphomet of Luciferian lore. This is a bastardization of a slightly different subject matter that won't be covered in this article. But, I digress.
As human beings, we must sincerely appreciate both energies, and uplift the subtle one within the beings that consist of mostly female energy. This is not because it is of greater importance as a force, but because it should be rightly respected and recognized. As mentioned, the Spartans were a warrior class of people, and Spartan women were tough and proud. They embraced their femininity, as they knew that it was their energy that gave life to Spartan men and women. In nature, as with many birds, the male of the species is often larger and more colorful, while the female seems to blend more with their surroundings? Many think this is meant to distract predators from the more camouflaged female while she is nesting. Perhaps such colorful and boisterous males also attract the more bland female for mating. Nature often reflects reality, at least on this earthly plane. Though I throw no stones at alternative lifestyles, they are not the reality of nature, but uniquely human constructs in rebellion with normalcy. Human beings pride themselves with free-will, and the freedom to do as they wish with their lives. We must all be respectful of one another, but we should encourage the norm. There are traces of estrogen in men, and a smidgen of testosterone in women. That should be of no surprise when realizing the possibility of our true origin. But, we are differentiated by numerous genetic factors, including the genome that determines whether we are male or female. Placing transgender men in the same realm as biological women is a slippery slope. One can identify as anything they choose, but the underlying genome that makes us the sex we are, cannot be denied. This need not bring an unnecessary burden to transgenders, who have the right to live their lives as they choose as long as it doesn't encroach upon the reality that they are born men or women and identify otherwise. I may identify as the King of England, but if I ask for someone's head, surely no sane person would hack-it-off by me ordering it done. It seems alarming that we claim that people are mentally ill or disabled, because they are determined to have bi-polar disorder, schizophrenia, PTSD or other mental or emotional maladies. Yet, somehow, one's obsession with an opposite sexual identity is determined as normal as long as society is forced to embrace it, else be seen as cruel or bias. Strange days indeed.
Evil has long sought to erect barriers between men and women, rich and poor, light races and dark races, conservatives and liberals, and so on. They need chaos and confusion among ourselves in order to manage the flock or herd. If our existence is as I theorize, we have indeed been sheep in need of a shepherd. That shepherd will either be the prince of this world, or our Savior in Heaven who said, “Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls.” For those who have not found our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, think of it as I have once coined the situation. “We as a human race are all sheep. No one that is human is exempt from that status. So, as a sheep, would you rather have a shepherd that wants you for your wool, or for your meat?”
